|
|
USER COMMENTS BY ST JEREMIAH |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 169 user comments posted recently. |
| |
|
|
11/27/08 1:47 PM |
St Jeremiah | | Salt Lake City, UT | | | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Faithful Remnant wrote: There is more to the word baptize than meets the eye...i.e. more than just immerse. If somebody prefers pouring or sprinkling over immersion, I see no reason to burden their conscience with a different opinion(immersion only) as being the only valid baptism. The clearest example that shows the meaning of baptizo is a text from the Greek poet and physician Nicander, who lived about 200 B.C. It is a recipe for making pickles and is helpful because it uses both words. Nicander says that in order to make a pickle, the vegetable should first be 'dipped' (bapto) into boiling water and then 'baptised' (baptizo) in the vinegar solution. Both verbs concern the immersing of vegetables in a solution. But the first is temporary. The second, the act of baptising the vegetable, produces a permanent change. When used in the New Testament, this word more often refers to our union and identification with Christ than to our water baptism. e.g. Mark 16:16. 'He that believes and is baptised shall be saved'. Christ is saying that mere intellectual assent is not enough. There must be a union with him, a real change, like the vegetable to the pickle! Bible Study Magazine James Montgomery Boice, May 1989. |
|
|
11/19/08 4:15 PM |
St Jeremiah | | Salt Lake City, UT | | | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Nathan wrote: St Jeremiah I hope you don't place salvation by grace through faith in the cultural context of 1st Century Middle East like you do Leviticus 19:18? The gospel occured in history in another culture. Yet the message transcends time and culture. God saved by faith after the fall....after Noah....after Abraham...onward.
Nathan wrote: I mean how far does cultural context operate? It's up to the bias of the individual to which many ministers in churches today do not even believe in God ... probably because it isn't culturally relevant to do so today. It isn't culturally relevant to be against homosexuality. What you are proposing is that changing standards of a society can change what is relevant in scripture. I like that you state the scripture yet you voted no. That takes a lot of mental gymnastics. None the less at least you still come to the same conclusion that it defiles the temple of God. Just watch out cultural context does not supersede scripture. I follow the literal, historical grammatical interpretation of the Bible. A lot of poor hermeneutics is a result of ignorance of the history and culture that the Bible was written in. They do not know where to divide the O.T. from the N.T. |
|
|
11/19/08 3:52 PM |
St Jeremiah | | Salt Lake City, UT | | | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Amillennialism wrote: This implies that eternal life promised in Scripture is only 1000 years. That is not true. But Christ promised......... John 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: 28. And I give unto them ETERNAL LIFE; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. Not at all. Eternal life is a gift (Romans 6:23)....the Millennium is a historical event that will follow after the second coming of Jesus to fulfill God's promise to Israel in His covenants (Abrahamic, Mosaic, Land, Davidic, and the New and Everlasting Covenant). |
|
|
11/19/08 3:00 PM |
St Jeremiah | | Salt Lake City, UT | | | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Person wrote: There isn't going to be a "Rapture" This is just an invention of that poor overindulged girl Margaret MacDonald in 1830. The pre-tribulational timing of the rapture never had its source in Francisco Ribera (1537-1591), Emmanuel Lacunza (1731-1801), Reverend Edward Irving (1792-1834), Margaret McDonald (fifteen years old in 1830) or John Nelson Darby (1800-1882). The study of prophecy, using the literal method of interpretation, did not begin in ernest until after the 1600's. The dominate Protestant interpretation of prophecy was using the allegorical method. The doctrine was being developed...but no one theologian or preacher systemized the doctrine. John Darby, was not studying or teaching prophecy when he was an Anglican clergyman in Ireland. "In October 1827, he fell from a horse and was seriously injured. He later stated that it was during this time that he recognized that the "kingdom" described in the Book of Isaiah and elsewhere in the Old Testament was entirely different from the Christian church." [URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Darby_(evangelist)]]]Wiki[/URL] |
|
|
11/11/08 6:32 PM |
St Jeremiah | | Salt Lake City, UT | | | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
I do agree with the question. Do you believe the Bible teaches predestination? I disagree with the choices offered. What does the Bible give as its own answer? Romans 8:29For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. 30And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified. This is the entire scope of the Christian life....after we are saved....we are to be conformed to the image of Christ. Or as Paul said it another way; He who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus. Php 1:6 Predestination is concerned with sanctification....not with soeteriology. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|