|
|
USER COMMENTS BY HUGH |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 10 · Found: 196 user comments posted recently. |
| |
|
|
3/22/15 11:15 PM |
|
Add new comment
|
simply wonderful! I run out of superlatives Brother Jeff when describing how i have been blessed by your preaching
Thank you person of the Holy Spirit, in Christ. |
|
|
2/25/15 6:09 AM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
This is the very saddest of news... This news should Drive us to our knees, should break our hearts, We should spend every available moment pleading with God to spare our brethren any distress. Likewise, We should spend equal amount of time pleading for the souls of those poor misguided members of Isis.BUT, I wonder if We are too comfortable, Too safe, In our insulated western society to truly identify with the suffering of our middle east brothers and sisters In Christ.!! In truth, i pose the above chiefly to myself. ..... Father Forgive My at times indifference to what is going on In the World. Re-ignite my passion for the löst, burden me with a desire to pray for my brethren whom are suffering and whom are persecuted.... AWAKE THIS SLEEPY CHRISTIAN.!!!!! |
|
|
11/17/14 6:26 PM |
Hugh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Why is this included @ SermonAudio?What possible connection is there to Christianity, and how is this horrific story in the least way edifying? All things are to be done unto edifying. This gruesome and sordid story is not. Come on, team, you can do better! Thank you. |
|
|
4/24/13 3:12 PM |
Hugh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Unprofitable Servant wrote: 1. One that states a person (infant or otherwise) was baptized without believing. 2. The Scripture that says baptism replaced circumcision WCF 28: 1. "Baptism is a sacrament of the New Testament, ordained by Jesus Christ,a not only for the solemn admission of the party baptized into the visible Church,b but also to be unto him a sign and seal of the covenant of grace,c of his ingrafting into Christ,d of regeneration,e of remission of sins,f and of his giving up unto God, through Jesus Christ, to walk in newness of life:g which sacrament is, by Christ’s own appointment, to be continued in his Church until the end of the world.h a. Mat 28:19. • b. 1 Cor 12:13. • c. Rom 4:11 with Col 2:11-12. • d. Rom 6:5; Gal 3:27. • e. Titus 3:5. • f. Mark 1:4. • g. Rom 6:3-4. • h. Mat 28:19-20.4. Not only those that do actually profess faith in and obedience unto Christ,a but also the infants of one or both believing parents are to be baptized.b a. Mark 16:15-16; Acts 8:37-38. • b. Gen 17:7, 9 with Gal 3:9, 14 and Col 2:11-12 and Acts 2:38-39 and Rom 4:11-12; Mat 28:19; Mark 10:13-16; Luke 18:15; 1 Cor 7:14." Now don't forget to add to this the historic truth that the Baptist interpretation wasn't invented until 1521ff. |
|
|
4/24/13 11:30 AM |
Hugh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: 1. Acts 8:35-38 KJV 2. And so patronising, just like all Presbys I've encountered in the past 1. John I said doctrine - "doctrine" look the word up.1b. Perhaps you are thinking about v37 "And Philip said, IF thou BELIEVEST with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I BELIEVE THAT JESUS CHRIST IS THE SON OF GOD." Now even you cannot assume that to be a quote "doctrine" John - surely?? All Philip is doing is doing is satisfying himself that the eunuch has grasped the sense of it all, and continuing in conversation with him. BTW if you contend that this whole section is "doctrinal" - Do you also require all converts to be "eunuch" too?? 2. And of course John after a statement like that we are to assume you are NOT patronising. Mike wrote: 1. It's for you to show paedobaptism from Scripture 2. You guess which 1. God said, "10 This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised. v12 And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised" The only part of this changed by Christ is circumcision. Age has not been rescinded!!2. God's choice. |
|
|
4/23/13 4:04 PM |
Hugh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: Ahem... 1. Acts 8:35-39 KJV2. I always thought Jacob and Esau were OT characters, one elect, the other not. And seeing as they were twins, and had Isaac for father 1. Which part of this do you consider to be doctrine on so called believers baptism?2. Is that the sum total of your doctrine on Covenant? +++++++ Mike wrote: If somewhere in those verses you see the command to baptize babies, please share. Otherwise again it is you are doing the adding. The Bible is ONE book written by God. NOT a bunch of differing authors vying for religious control over the church. The laws precepts statutes and doctrines are God's. The whole counsel of God IS the Bible. What Deuteronomy, Proverbs and Revelation are referring to on "add" or "take away" words/themes etc is to the entire law, precepts, statutes and doctrines of God. Otherwise Mike TELL us which books and chapters you want to change - perhaps because you know better than God??? Perhaps you'd like to change the doctrine on depth of water for baptism - or perhaps the doctrine to precondition or qualify baptism to be authorized by a sinners decision? OOps you've already done those haven't you. |
|
|
4/23/13 1:00 PM |
Hugh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Unprofitable Servant wrote: EXACTLY!!!! Which is why the padedobaptist is adding to the Scripture when he says the household included infants. Thank you for making my point. Boy you Baptists twist and turn like the snake, don't you. We don't have to use the household age theory even though it does come down on our side anyway. We use God's Covenant its basic rules and the age God ordained in the OT. In other words we take the written facts from the Bible to obey God in baptism. There is nothing in Scripture to support Baptist theory of discrimination against the Babies of Covenanted parents. Nor is there any doctrine or precept in Scripture to support the Baptist theory of subjects must be able to make a verbal confession. ++++++ John UK wrote: "Jacob I have loved and Esau have I hated" covenant. If thats all you know of God's Covenant John, then I am heartily sorry for your ignorance. You Baptists don't use the Old Testament in your doctrine do you?+++++ Mike wrote: you are adding to Scripture Apparently I stand in good company. Moses said so too. Eg: Deut 4:2, 12:32, and Agur at Proverbs 30:5,6. Its only the Baptists who reject the OT. |
|
|
4/23/13 12:00 PM |
Hugh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Unprofitable Servant wrote: All the verse that talk about household salvation and baptisms only had adults and teenagers in them. Ooohh Look!!! The Bible never refers to or provides the age of all in the households.Why then do the Baptists require deception and lies to convince us of their baptism age discrimination policy??? Adding to Scripture to make it work??? Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:" At least the Covenantal paedobaptist is entirely Scriptural in baptism. ++++++ John UK wrote: Sure, if the babies show evidence of putting their trust in Christ and are truly repentant Can't trust God to honour the Covenant eh John? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|