|
|
USER COMMENTS BY GOOD BREAK |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 11 user comments posted recently. |
|
|
10/10/15 11:13 AM |
good break | | lake | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Rom 1:21-25Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. As man is made in "the image of God" Gen. 1:27 transhumanism fits this Romans 1 condemnation.. Besides...given the complexities, what are the odds improvements could occur? The silly lie of random mutations evolving upwards, relies on ignorance of 4 dimensional gene structure,etc. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016622360400205X Just a link to note yes this concept exists. |
|
|
10/10/15 7:37 AM |
good break | | sat down | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
[URL=http://sciencespeaks.dstoner.net/Christ_of_Prophecy.html#c9]]]science Speaks: Scripture Statistcs Stats[/URL] Best use of #s with Bible:Peter Stoner For example- looking at 8 prophecies of Christ- the chances that " one man in how many men, the world over, will fulfill all eight prophecies? This question can be answered by applying our principles of probability. In other words, by multiplying all of our estimates together,..".."This gives 1 in 2.8 x10 to28th power,where 28 means that we have 28 ciphers following the 2.8. Let us simplify and reduce the number by calling it 1 in 10to 28thWritten out this number is 1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. " Division by conservative history of people on earth thru all history is 1 chance in 10,000,000,000,000,000 - Peter Stoner goes on to show that the evidence equals ontological certitude : Math confirmation of the Risen Lord's authority&reliability. This use of math distills intuition to show the authority of Christ-the Lord of creation - who warns against men's corrupt plans. Transhumanism echoes Romans 1:21-25. Christ our Creator has a better plan for us than degrading people to plants&animals. |
|
|
10/7/15 7:31 PM |
Good break | | Abacus | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Dave wrote: incredible sequence and chain sequence of #s [URL=http://achristiananswers.blogspot.com/2011/04/hepatic-structure-in-bible.html?m=1 ]]]Khouse ministries likes to use hepTAtic structure summary of this Panin #s[/URL] Though that isn't from Missler. the target audience for this variety of inquiry? Math geeks. [URL=http://www.khouse.org/articles/1995/102/]]]Evidence of Design : Panin cited on #s[/URL] The first 17 verses of the Gospel of Matthew are a logical unit, or section, which deals with a single principal subject: the genealogy of Christ. It contains 72 Greek vocabulary words in these initial 17 verses. (The verse divisions are man's allocations for convenience, added in the 13th century.) The number of words which are nouns is exactly 56, or 7 x 8. The Greek word "the" occurs most frequently in the passage: exactly 56 times, or 7 x 8. Also, the number of different forms in which the article "the" occurs is exactly 7. There are two main sections in the passage: verse 1-11, and 12-17. In the first main section, the number of Greek vocabulary words used is 49, or 7 x 7. .,, It continues. Panin's book : http://www.telusplanet.net/public/tsgibson/panin.pdf Tho Panin goes too far-intriguing! |
|
|
10/7/15 6:45 AM |
Good break | | Dawn | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
B. McCausland: So: gematria vs patterns:started talking about this after 1st post Hoggard transhuman exposé -- I pulled out a few refence bibles ( I changed over to non-commentary Bibles about 20yrs back because of finding flaws in works like Companion Bible , etc. some of them tell how many times word appears- and a few point out patterns that look like design . This math genius had a heptatic structure study. http://achristiananswers.blogspot.com/2011/04/hepatic-structure-in-bible.html?m=1 Ivan Panin Isn't deriving any meaning from the # 7 but shows design. As does the Reg Kelly link below on SA. I don't even trust Strong's anymore. # of Jesus there is 2424
Re:Hoggard ; he doesn't need to count words - his church member writes free software that gives the # of times words occur automatically! # shows on any search! (I haven't 'Tried ' the software) But that would not give the strange ' 888 ' =Jesus. I see where that is from: both Hebrew & Greek were letter = # systems. ( this was before Arabic numerals-even pre-zero. So what do YOU do with injunction "Count the number" Rev 13:18 ? A general OK to count: but not gematria [URL=http://reason.landmarkbiblebaptist.net/888.html ]]]Patterns of #s[/URL] |
|
|
10/6/15 6:49 PM |
Good Break | | Clear day | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Hoggy Fan wrote: [URL=http://www.levendwater.org/books/numbers/number_in_scripture_bullinger.pdf]]]Numbers in scripture:Bullinger Book[/URL] So Bullinger's #s was online. his investigation of patterns in structure of scripture in His Companion Bible is interesting. My hard copy is filed away. & dusty --online tho!-- http://www.companionbiblecondensed.com/Bullinger/CB.htm --- B. McCausland rightly warns that Using the Talmud! By Bullinger Makes this # book at best a Reference that explains source of weird # meanings. Bullinger citing a corrupt source : THE TALMUD !!! Yikes! Should put your guard up. So!That's why Hoggard never references Bullinger!he always likes to count things out for himself. Bullinger: " ? 888 is the number or gematria of the name "JESUS." " Heard that from lots of preachers- is this the source?
Jesus vs Pharisees & Scribes re Misnah &Talmud was a "pastor Mike Online " subject a few years back. "Count the number" is still a command ; but skip Talmudic gematria. Rev 13:18 Can't be wrong intrinsically to count when that command is there. I listened to Reg Kelly on number patterns- are lots of intricate numerical patterns. But he doesn't cite Bullinger either. |
|
|
10/6/15 5:56 AM |
Good break | | Soupy fog | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
angel proceation view wrote:
1. [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=31813940495]]]Dr Curt Daniel gives clear overview of Fallen Angels who went after strange flesh as shown in Gen. 6[/URL] Best short audio overview of all perspectives & why the classic reading that Giants in Gen 6 are result of fallen spirits' leaving their first estate. 2. [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=6161521284]]]Chris Lesley gives physical evidence[/URL 3. [URL=http://media.SermonAudio.com/mediapdf/8305222842.pdf]]]The Sons of God, Bob Vincent[/URL] Cites in this PDF the books of : Job, 2 Peter ch 2, Jude., &Peter re"Tartaros" "this interpretation has been around at least for almost 2000 years" Says Pastor Vincent 4. [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=317132120465]]]Genesis 6 -the Sons of God; 6 part series starts here by Jason Cooley[/URL] 5. Get Real called as expert witness Connie, & Unprofitable Servant also said that was a good source. Connie says "The Sons of God in the Old Testament did not refer to human believers. It referred to angels only. Secondly, just because angels do not marry does not mean they are sexless. " says Get Real's "expert witness. Quote of Connie , cited by Get Real below |
|
|
10/5/15 8:42 PM |
good break | | fog | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
The giants from sons of God teaching, per Connie- Recommended by GetvReal is "not a doctrine of demons, it is a biblical doctrine ABOUT demons. The article you referenced has some errors. First you do not interpret an Old Testament usage of a word from the New Testament meaning. The Sons of God in the Old Testament did not refer to human believers. It referred to angels only. Secondly, just because angels do not marry does not mean they are sexless. " says Get Real's "expert witness. Quote of Connie cited by Get Real in her first post : June 12 2012 at 11:46am from Get Real's link: http://bibleconundrumsandcontroversy.blogspot.com/2012/03/mike-hoggard-anti-apostasy-teacher-or.html So this teaching : that Get Real says is evil : is taught by the exact person Get Real cites to diss Hoggard. Weird. Also in Connie's 1st paragraph she says " He also teaches a lot about the Masons and other occult teachings. It is good for people to be made aware of these things. In short, a great deal of what he teaches is good for people to know. " which is why Hoggard pulls out Pike(mason's guru)-to warn of Mason lies. but Get Real twists this to Using Pike positively.. weird again.. Don't confuse me with facts - I have made up my mind. |
|
|
10/5/15 7:28 PM |
Good break | | Fog | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Get Real wrote:
your last post? All wrong1. Pike is vilified regularly by Hoggard: anyone who listens to him knows that. 2. Counting the number of times something occurs and relating it to structure is an accounting practice :Bullinger has the greatest examples of this & this is as far as Hoggard goes. Either you don't know this and post in ignorance? Or you don't know what gematria is( vastly different- and specifically taught AGAINST by Pastor Hoggard) [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=420151429532]]]Numbers do not lie: Hoggard on # Patterns[/URL] 3.Hoggard's many messages refuting Hebrew roots as heresy: [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?speakerWithinSource=&subsetCat=&subsetItem=&mediatype=&includekeywords=&exactverse=&keyword=Mike_Hoggard&keyworddesc=Mike+Hoggard&currsection=sermonsspeaker&AudioOnly=false&SpeakerOnly=true&keywordwithin=Roots&x=5&y=3]]]Hoggard rebukes Hebrew roots on SA[/URL] 4 you have not listened to the 1st post message that specifically teaches against Serpent Seed lies : your first post decried that doctrine & implied it is taught by Mike : the Exact opposite is true. 5[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=926131546431]]]Jezebel defeated:Hoggard[/URL] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|