Really, Justin? Did you realize that you just engaged in name-calling when you called me "juvenile", and implied I was speaking "baby talk"? It seems maybe you don't want a rational conversation? First I get to deal with Mr. Schizophrenic telling me how I apologize too much, and now I get to deal with you? What is this, dog pile on the cheeta?

I don't see anybody complaining when Trump gets all of the delegates in a state because he's a couple of points above Cruz. The point is, the delegates are unbound (that's why they're called "unbound delegates").

Not true. That's a lot of speculation coming from you. And what again is wrong with a candidate winning over delegates? It isn't immoral if it's Trump winning over delegates, and there equally isn't anything immoral about Cruz winning over delegates. If Trump were attempting to win over Cruz delegates, I don't believe anyone on here would be saying that was dirty tricks! Trump isn't even trying to get delegates, he's firing his staff in states after the primaries, and has not spoken with the delegates. Is there anything wrong with another candidate talking to them and presenting their case? Of course not, whether it be Trump or Cruz.

None of us are saying that. Everyone, including Trump supporters have a first ammendment right! It doesn't matter if we agree or not, we still have a right to voice our opinion.

False, Jim. Name one quote from Ted Cruz were he said he was a Dominionist! Could these accusations comming from you have anything to do with the fact Trump would be easier for Hillary to beat then Cruz? You did talk about Carter's stance on Trump and how much you agreed with him. Intersting.

Now, let's be honest ET. Trump isn't a Homo; he's a Homo-Sesquatches!

Yah, if newswithviews (the site that called Trump God's chosen!), can be considered reputable sourcing! You have legitimized lies repeatedly, and when proven wrong, you don't appologize for your spreading of deceitful lies, instead you either conveniently stop talking about it, or you double down on it! I am not saying you are purposing to spread lies, just that your lack of true investigation and your willingness to believe something if it's said on some blog, youtube video, or conspiracy site enables these kinds of falsehoods to spread and continue to mislead and decieve people. You lose credibility when you lend your voice to lies, whether intentional or unintentional. I hope you don't view this as an attack against you, because it's not. I am just suggesting you may want to consider doing deeper research on legitimate sources on an issue before you claim it to be true. Heck, I could find a lot of things on Trump on some of these less reputable sites, but I never would spread such things. Courtesy and truth go both ways.

Yah, so vote for the guy who has Dr. Ben Carson on his side (otherwise known as "Mr. Force Everyone to get a Shot)! That will make things better! Right? The people who are in denial are the people like you who will support Trump despite his terrible record!