Popular pastor and speaker Francis Chan recorded a video in the Basic series (http://basicseries.com/films/holy-spirit.php) that has been popularly received by many. For a short while it was also available for free on the web for anyone to watch it, and again, well received. However, though it is compelling in many ways, ultimately it is deficient in its theology and biblical basis. Pastor Henry seeks to use it to illustrate how Christians must always exercise discernment and care in what they hear regardless of how good or trustworthy (which Pastor Henry believes is true of Chan) the source is.
Please Note: 28 seconds into this sermon there was a video shown. this video can be found on the web site above. Also, the PDF discussed during sermon is posted on Sermon Audio and can be seen in the PDF section of this sermon.
SERMON ACTIVITY
This MP3 sermon was last played: 21 hours ago | more »
This PDF text was last viewed: 23 hours ago | more »
Featuring a sermon puts it on the front page of the site and is the most effective way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands including all mobile platforms + newsletter.
Text-Featuring a sermon is a less expensive way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands on the right bar with optional newsletter inclusion. As low as $30/day.
“ He is taking Chan's words out of context ” If you take literally what Francis Chan is saying, then yes, Matthew Henry has a point. But if Chan is saying we should let the Spirit work, it does not mean we should literally do nothing. Even Chan is working hard as well, giving his money away, helping and building up others.
It's the same principle with the other arguments used.
Tom (12/6/2013)
“ ” More biblically unsound than anything I have ever heard out of Francis Chan's mouth!
Rachel (7/24/2012)
“ About the spirit ” I was confused on what he meant about how the receiving of the spirit was just for then? I have experienced and witness many people receiving the spirit and speak in tongues even now so how can he say that was just for then?
