It is crucial to have a correct understanding of the Mosaic Law. The New Testament presupposes a knowledge of the Old Testament. Old Testament events can illustrate and support biblical doctrine. The use of the Old Testament in analogy or illustration does not change or alter the historical even. The use of the Old Testament in analogy or illustration does not establish biblical doctrine. Those who promote the Mosaic Law oppose and persecute the children of the promise. Those who promote the Law have not part in the promise of God, Galatians 4:30. Those who promote the Law must be removed from the fellowship. True believers must appreciate their freedom in Christ.
Featuring a sermon puts it on the front page of the site and is the most effective way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands including all mobile platforms + newsletter.
Text-Featuring a sermon is a less expensive way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands on the right bar with optional newsletter inclusion. As low as $30/day.
Gil attacks works salvation-Excellent! My tablet really messed up this time! I'm not sure why I recopied the snippet from Barnes commentary but read it it's entirety, it is a long and excellent one on allegory and why my tablet seems to put it in the below amazes me. of course it's all my tablet's fault. ☟ ;-) So certainly listen to Gil Rugh's sermon and read what' the written summary covers--it is good also!
¶Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary on the Entire Bible
¶Galatians 4
¶21-27 The difference between believers who rested in Christ only, and those who trusted in the law, is explained by the histories of Isaac and Ishmael. These things are an allegory, wherein, beside the literal and historical sense of the words, the Spirit of God points out something further. Hagar and Sarah were apt emblems of the two different dispensations of the covenant. The heavenly Jerusalem, the true church from above, represented by Sarah, is in a state of freedom, and is the mother of all believers, who are born of the Holy Spirit. They were by regeneration and true faith, made a part of the true seed of Abraham, according to the promise made to him. ¶ ☚Matthew Henry certainly doesn't mean the same thing as Dispensationalists mean by the term, "dispensations" he isn't wrong he just has a different meaning for it!
Jim Lincoln (7/10/2021)
from Nebraska
Great Sermon! I hope you have listened to the entire sermon!
¶Barnes' New Testament Notes
¶Galatians 4
¶Verse 24. Which things. The different accounts of Ishmael and Isaac.
¶Are an allegory. May be regarded allegorically, or as illustrating great principles in regard to the condition of slaves and freemen; and may therefore be used to illustrate the effect of servitude to the law of Moses compared with the freedom of the gospel. He does not mean to say that the historical record of Moses was not true, or was merely allegorical; nor does he mean to say that Moses meant this to be an allegory,...¶
¶
Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible Galatians 4:25
The above will actually cover the verses of Gal. 4:21 - 31!
¶
☚Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary on the Entire Bible
Galatians 4:24 - 27
Verse 24. Which things. The different accounts of Ishmael and Isaac.
Are an allegory. May be regarded allegorically, or as illustrating great principles in regard to the condition of slaves and freemen; and may therefore be used to illustrate the effect of servitude to the law of Moses compared with the freedom of the gospel. He does not mean to say that the historical record of Moses was not true, or was merely allegorical; nor does he mean to say that Moses meant this to be an a
In the fall of 1969, Gil began a full-time teaching ministry as Senior Pastor of Indian Hills Community Church. He also earned his Ph.D. from the California Graduate School of Theology. The focus of Pastor Rugh’s ministry is systematic, verse-by-verse teaching of the Bible. As a...