|
|
USER COMMENTS BY AHEM |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 123 user comments posted recently. |
| |
|
|
1/26/18 9:38 AM |
Ahem | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John for JESUS wrote: Dr. Tim... If Jesus was judged for all of Paul's sins, He would be in Hell and eternally separated from God like every other sinner will be. However, that wasn't the case. Someone who is clueless as to what happened at Calvary. |
|
|
1/25/18 8:20 AM |
Ahem | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John for JESUS wrote: Nobody had their sins forgiven at the cross. Blasphemy! Is 53.5 .... with his stripes we are healed Is 53.6 .....the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all Is 53.8 .....he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of MY PEOPLE was he stricken Is 53.11 ....by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities Is 53.12 ......he bare the sin of many Someone doesn't understand the cross work of Christ, or penal substitutionary atonement! |
|
|
1/24/18 2:35 PM |
Ahem | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John for JESUS wrote: 1) Correct, so I am trying to point out that the Holy Spirit only convicts believers. The preaching of the gospel convicts sinful unbelievers. It pierces the natural man. 2) It doesn't say that. A natural man doesn't understand the convictions and wisdom that comes from the Holy Spirit, which can only be understood by those who have the Spirit. That doesn't mean a unbeliever can't be convicted by someone preaching the gospel. Read 1 Cor 2.14 again and tell me where it says that a person who cannot receive the things of God because they are not spiritual can nevertheless receive spiritual convictions. You're clearly not understanding the verse and its implications. |
|
|
1/22/18 7:05 PM |
Ahem | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Connor7 wrote: James let's put it in perspective, 1. The English language came into existence about 1,000 years ago. 2. If you say Wycliffe bible was corrupt, that Tyndale really didn't have it all that right, and neither did the Geneva Bible, then the English-speaking people did not have a perfect Bible until 1611 that would mean that the English-speaking people of God did not have the full word of God until 1611, and even then there are differences in which KJV you use, the Oxford and the Cambridge are not not identical, so if a KJVonlyist is to be consistent, we have to ask, "Which of the KJV do you hold to and why?" Another problem is, if you don't understand a word in the KJV, which English dictionary do you consult? Because you can't go to the Greek, Hebrew, or Aramaic, that'd undercut KJVonlyism, and the closest dictionary we have to 1611 is the 1825 discretionary, which is 200+ years away from the 1611 By your own account since the 2 manuscripts upon which the majority of Bible translations now heavily rely weren't found until the 19th century the people of God didn't have the Word of God until the late 1800s. I suggest your predicament is even deeper than that of the KJVO camp. |
|
|
12/23/14 4:42 PM |
Ahem | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: This is a very clever move, Ahem. Congratulations! If you do not regard me as a Christian brother but a Jesuit troll, that means that you don't have to love me like you love the saints. Yes, I am full of admiration for your tactics. However, the LIVING Lord Jesus is not impressed, and I trust he will have words with you, lest you go down deeper into the pit you are making for yourself. I would not wish to see that happen, because I am filled with joy of the Holy Ghost and desire your blessing and sanctification, even though you would have me separated from my brethren and sisters on this site. Funny how you use a deplorable tactic and then turn on someone else when they point it out. Real cute!Obviously, this hyped up holier than thou gives you a real buzz buddy, because you use it at every opportunity to run people down, now even speaking for God himself. Wow! How special are you? As for your further tripe I think you've damaged your own reputation and don't need help to self destruct, especially when you've got your goad mate to help. |
|
|
12/22/14 6:56 PM |
Ahem | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: To Ahem and Analysis, I am filled with joy of the Holy Ghost. Another fallacy viz. claiming exclusivity to a blessing and thereby assuming that others do not enjoy this, or that they must be incorrect doctrinally. Mr wiseguy would do well to take a chill pill and step back from the affray to examine himself before his pride cause him a mighty fall. |
|
|
|
Jump to Page : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|