|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ THEFACTS ” |
|
|
| · Page 1 · Found: 16 user comments posted recently. |
|
|
 5/26/14 2:19 PM |
| the facts | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Unprofitable Servant wrote:
Amazing the shooter picked a gun free zone, because WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, and he didn't want someone with a gun to stop him Oh c'mon UPS. "gun free zone" IN America are you kidding me? Doesn't matter where you live in the US you can get guns, assault rifles bazookas tanks and nuclear submarines if you have the cash. From your nearest mall gun store!!! |
|
|
| 1/16/13 4:04 PM |
| the facts | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Clown of God wrote:
Can you send an article about a RCC "porn house"? The Roman Catholic Church was accurately identified in the Reformation as the Whore of Babylon. With her idolatry and adultery from God and Christ this is as true today as it always was. |
|
|
| 12/6/10 3:21 PM |
| The Facts | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
The makeup of any Bible translation team that is entirely British, as far as I have seen, has always led to an inferior version of the Bible. The KJV is a prime example. OH Really Yank!!!!!And just where WAS America in 1611 when GOD translated the Bible into english??? IN BRITAIN! Thats when BRITAIN was in charge of the colonies sunbeam!!! When Your ancestors were subjects of a real British King! GOD used the KING JAMES VERSION from then to build America its churches and its people. AND continues to use it to teach and preach true doctrine to His true elect today. You cannot say that about your corrupt NASB and its Liberal ANGLICAN writers, can you Jim!!! On Westcott and Horts criminal Greek Text....
"To cast away at least nineteen-twentieths of the evidence on points and to draw conclusions from the petty remainder, seems to us to be necessarily not less even than a crime and a sin, and only by reason of the sacrilegious destructiveness exercised thereby upon Holy Writ, but also because such a method is inconsistent with conscientious exhaustiveness and logical method." [Dean Burgon, The Traditional Text, p. xii]" |
|
|
 9/2/09 5:37 PM |
| the facts | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
DisplacedMaritimer (Bert) wrote:
1] those hearing it were illiterate. 2] I just believe that the Word of God is for everyone. 3] If you have to use complex grammatical terminology to support your favorite interpretation of a passage I'd say your #2 cancels your #1.
By your representation you suggest that "reading" Scripture is for the illiterate also??? (Contradiction in terms)?
But you have set up a strawman!If you wish to discuss evangelism then God sends His called teachers/evangelists to all peoples. BUT THAT is not what we were talking about. Your #3 above is more to the point.
However I can see that it describes your church as well as mine. Or do you suggest that the RCC does not have theologians, dogma and doctrines? I quoted Calvin on Matt 16:18,19 re Peter.
The RC say in their interpretation here that this verse qualifies Peter as pope and subsequentley to all popes after him. That is NOT true.
This is an erroneous reading of Scripture. Even to say that the, "office called pope" as it has unfolded through history is defined in Scripture 'anywhere' is a fallacy and deceit.
Just as your version of what a 'saint' is and how they come into being is RC manmade doctrine and UNBiblical! |
|
|
| 9/2/09 3:56 PM |
| the facts | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
DisplacedMaritimer (Bert) wrote:
Apostolic Succession Re Peter as RC pope. (Matt 16:19)"All that was given to him, (Peter) therefore, must be limited to the measure of grace which he received for the edification of the Church; and so that vast dominion, which the Papists claim for him, falls to the ground. But though there were no strife or controversy about Peter, still this passage would not lend countenance to the tyranny of the Pope. For no man in his senses will admit the principle which the Papists take for granted, that what is here granted to Peter was intended to be transmitted by him to posterity by hereditary right; for he does not receive permission to give any thing to his successors. So then the Papists make him bountiful with what is not his own. Finally, though the uninterrupted succession were fully established, still the Pope will gain nothing by it till he has proved himself to be Peter's lawful successor. And how does he prove it? Because Peter died at Rome; as if Rome, by the detestable murder of the Apostle, had procured for herself the primacy. But they allege that he was also bishop there. How frivolous that allegation is."
(J.Calvin) |
|
|
| 9/2/09 2:39 PM |
| the facts | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
DisplacedMaritimer (Bert) wrote:
talking to Peter alone "But it will be said, Christ addresses Peter alone: he does so, because Peter alone, in the name of all, had confessed Christ to be the Son of God, and to him alone is addressed the discourse, which applies equally to the rest. And the reason adduced by Cyprian and others is not to be despised, that Christ spake to all in the person of one man, in order to recommend the unity of the Church. They reply, that he to whom this privilege was granted in a peculiar manner is preferred to all others. But that is equivalent to saying that he was more an apostle than his companions; for the power to bind and to loose can no more be separated from the office of teaching and the Apostleship than light or heat can be separated from the sun. And even granting that something more was bestowed on Peter than on the rest, that he might hold a distinguished place among the Apostles, it is a foolish inference of the Papists, that he received the primacy, and became the universal head of the whole Church. Rank is a different thing from power, and to be elevated to the highest place of honor among a few persons is a different thing from embracing the whole world under his dominion"(J Calvin) |
|
|
| 11/19/08 2:54 PM |
| TheFacts | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
TheRealFacts wrote:
His evil nature is in bondage to his will. Another "free will" advocate who would do salvation by human effort.
Are you Roman Catholic or Roman (Arminian) Catholic or Roman (non-Reformed) Catholic or just plain old Roman (DIY salvation) Catholic. |
|
|
| 11/18/08 4:58 PM |
| TheFacts | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
"Man's depravity, as a result of the Fall, is total. All men are born into this world spiritually dead, blind, and deaf to the things of God; the sinner's heart is desperately corrupt. His will is not free; it is in bondage to his evil nature. Therefore, he has lost his ability to choose good over evil in the spiritual realm. It takes more than the Spirit's assistance to bring the sinner to Christ -it takes regeneration by which the Spirit makes the sinner alive and gives him a new nature. Faith is not something man contributes to salvation but is itself a part of God's gift of salvation - it is God's gift to the sinner, not the sinner's gift to God."Psalm 51:5, 58:3; Isaiah 53:6, 64:6; Jeremiah 17:9; John 3:3, 8:44; Romans 3:10-12, 5:12; Ephesians 2:2-3; I Corinthians 2:14 [URL=http://www.the-highway.com/doctrinesofgrace.html]]]Doctrines of Grace[/URL] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
