Sounds like another compromise with the Word of God. Ideological ideas are to be found in all communities of the world. Changing the inspired word to accomodate these pagan and reprobate philosophies they have is not the way to communicate truth.

Son of God is not just terminology - It is a truth to be received by faith and faith alone.

Matthew 14:33 Then they that were in the ship came and worshipped him, saying, Of a truth thou art the Son of God.

Liberalism AGAIN!!!

The only way man can accept Islam is by rewriting the Bible. The consequences of that is the Wrath of God. Rom 1:18.

Acts 4:12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.

John 4:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Allan Schwarb wrote:
Therefore, what makes the RCC an "heretical cult"?

2. Idolatry - such as worship of old bones, statuettes, dead sinners, relics and other graven images.

3. Maryolatry and co-remptrix and co-mediatrix, together with "saint" worship is also idolatrous.

4. Pope as "vicar of Christ" is a lie.

5. The RC church is part of the "means" of salvation.

Good old Obama.

Don't you just love the mind set of these Liberal bureaucrats.

It's almost as if they have an inherent penchant to get everything "wrong," - or to put it another way "politically correct."
Which of course is the same thing.

For "violations of building permits."

The poor will always be with us as Jesus said and since, in His providence, He feeds His sheep we should share our blessings.

Mike wrote:
Could this be an example of insufficient reformation? Both adhere to "our common understanding" of the Sprinkler System if I'm not mistaken. If the CofS were dunkers, they'd have to find some other common ground.

The problem with the Kirk is the abomination of Liberal religion which is creating the evil pestilence of ecumenism in all the Liberal "churches."

Bad enough that they seek to hold hands with the antichrist papists, but the reason - "Liberalism which has replaced Christianity" - demonstrates how far this mob has gone away from the Bible.
They are even daft enough to be asking the RCC to commemorate the anniversary of the Scottish Reformation with them.
In the 16th century the papists were busy burning the real Christians at the stake.

Any Christians left in the C of S should leave immediately since Christ does not lie with belial.

"A CHURCH of Scotland body is urging congregations to celebrate their common baptism with Roman Catholics for the first time by using a special joint liturgy for the reaffirmation of baptismal vows.

The groundbreaking call, seen as a monumental step in inter-church links, is made in the report of the Kirk's Ecumenical Relations Committee to the General Assembly.

The liturgy was devised by the Joint Commission on Doctrine, made up of officials from both churches.

Following an extensive study period which looked at our common understanding of baptism, this new service is now being recommended by the Ecumenical Relations Committee for use at major Christian festivals, such as Easter and Pentecost. This year Pentecost falls on the Sunday of General Assembly week (23 May).

Modern nations have accepted sodomy as being one of the lifestyles belonging to mankind as a quote "normal" unquote way for some people to live.

These same nations murder babies in the womb.
These same nations "cannot" receive the truth.
These same nations are blinded by Satan.
These same nations "cannot" know God or His Son Jesus Christ.
These same nations believe that the world is billions of years old.
These same nations believe we came from monkeys.
These same nations do not possess faith.

These same peoples will spend an eternity in hell fire damnation......

Unless God changes their status to Christian.

That will upset the Pope.

Jim Lincoln wrote:
I wasn't redundant

"Westcott and Hort's Greek Text Was Based on "Ingenious Conjecture." Dr. Scrivener wrote: "There is little hope for the stability of their [Westcott & Hort's] imposing structure, if its foundations have been laid on the sandy ground of ingenious conjecture. And, since barely the smallest vestige of historical evidence has ever been alleged in support of the views of these accomplished editors, their teaching must either be received as intuitively true, or dismissed from our consideration as precarious and even visionary." [Dr. F.H.A. Scrivener's Plain Introduction, 1883]