Your interpretation of the day of the Lord is one I have never heard of before. Can you please explain this position for me, as Im not exactly sure what you are saying it is? Unfortunately I have to go to work soon, so Ill have to check it out later.

Even dispensationalist concede that the day of the LORD is the second coming. Lets look at another verse that uses the same terminology.

1 Thessalonians 5:1 But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you. 5:2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. 5:3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. 5:4 But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief. 5:5 Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. 5:6 Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober.

It is clear from this passage that the day of the Lord is the second coming, for it says ye ARE not in darkness, speaking of their present state at the time, and Verse 6 has the same exhortation to watch for that day like we see else where like Matthew 25:13.

Christ has already recieved the throne of David in heaven, NOT a throne in Jerusalm for a thousand years. Besides which, the new earth accompanies the second coming of Christ, it is not sepatated by a thousand years.

And not confined to a thousand years. All the verses concerningthe throne of David or the Kingship of Christ (2Sam 7:16, Psa 89:3,4, Isa 9:6,7, Jer 33:20,21, Acts 5:31, 1Pet 3:21,22, Phi 2:9-11, Eph 1:20-23, Mat 28:18) seem to confirm Peters statement that Christ is ruling and reigning from his throne in heaven, and not some earthly reign of Christ. Also:

Luke 1:30 And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God. 1:31 And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. 1:32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: 1:33 And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be NO END.

Acts 2:29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. 2:30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne; 2:31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption. 2:32 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses. 2:33 Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear. 2:34 For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, 2:35 Until I make thy foes thy footstool. 2:36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ.

I never said you believe those absurdities, but rather that the literal approach dispensationalist rely on naturally leads you there. Also, I never said that I dont take the Bible literally, but rather that one should interpret Scripture with Scripture. Some verses are literal, others symbolic. Surely you dont take every verse in the Bible literally.