There are two general positions debated among good Christians as to the identity of the "sons of God" in Genesis 6:1-4. However, because "no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation" (2 Peter 1:20), of these two opposing positions, only one can be correct.
This two-part message explains why the pop-view and its resulting Nephilim/Alien infatuation promoted by Thomas Horn, Steve Quayle, LA Marzulli and others, that the sons of God in that chapter are fallen angels who abduct and mate with human women to produce a cross-bred race of monstrous giants called the Nephilim, is BY FAR the least Biblical and most objectionable of the two positions.
Part One of the series lays out the two opposing views, exposes the folly of reliance upon extra-biblical sources such as the alleged books of Jasher and Enoch, and exposes those two sources as fabricated frauds filled with fantasy, fairy tales, folklore, and outright HERESY. Those that rely on these sources to support their position do so to their own shame and embarrassment.
Part Two presents three well grounded arguments from the Bible showing that the sons of God in Genesis 6, COULD NOT have been fallen angels:
1. Angels are created spirit beings, not physical, cannot transform themselves into humans, and are not capable of mating with human women.
2. The text itself of Genesis 6 does not support the fallen angels/nephilim theory.
3. Hebrews 1:5 - God does NOT call angels sons. Especially DEVILS who conspire to corrupt the human blood line to thwart God's plan to send the Messiah. This theory has no basis in scripture whatsoever.
Featuring a sermon puts it on the front page of the site and is the most effective way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands including all mobile platforms + newsletter.
Text-Featuring a sermon is a less expensive way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands on the right bar with optional newsletter inclusion. As low as $30/day.
