Maybe I should have worded that differently. I often have to edit due to the word limit on SA.

I do not know who he has offered to debate and who he has declined. I have no idea. I base what I posted on what I have read that James White has written and what I have heard him say. My first exposure to White was 'The King James Only Controversy' book. I do keep up with his website and I went to see him several years ago at a church here in Woodstock (KJ Only was the topic). My wife got into a discussion with him a few years ago on Janet Parshal's (sic?) radio show and he was unable to defend his support of the NIV.

From what I've seen and heard, he goes full throttle after easy targets like Ruckman and Riplinger (as he should) but is he strangely minimal regarding reliable KJV defenders of the AV like TBS or David Cloud.

"By the way Kenny, I am offended by you throwing Peter Ruckman and Fred Phelps into the same basket."

Offended?

I realize that being in Switzerland you may not be as familiar with Ruckman as those of us who live in the U.S. I would suggest that you do some research (Wayne's references are excellent ones) into the life and beliefs of Peter Ruckman.

Peter Ruckman is a mean, oft-divorced, misguided so-called preacher who ought to be an embarrassment to any follower of Christ. Much of what I have read that he's written is just plain nasty. When backed into a corner (because he cannot defend his nonsensical postions) he will call you names that I wouldn't post here.

I love and strongly support the KJV and I would never consider using any of the modern versions for a number of reasons. Sadly, Peter Ruckman has done FAR more harm than good for the cause of defending the KJV. He is one of the main reasons why people think KJV defenders are crazy & call us 'Ruckmanites'.

Notice that James White & others choose not to argue with the Trinitarian Bible Society because they can't win. Instead, they use Ruckman as an example in order to make all KJV defenders appear foolish.

God will judge this nation (or any other nation) for it's tolerance, acceptance and accommodation of sodomites. He has done it before and I believe He will do it again.

We need to fear God more than terrorists. Sadly, even most Christians do not fear God anymore because they have been taught in church to believe that He is your good time, rock & roll buddy who wants you happy, prosporous and successful. We are supposed to believe that sodomites are confused, helpless victims and that God wants us to be nice to them so that maybe they will change.

Let's take a mortal man, a wretched sinner just like every other mortal man, and let's put him in a nice robe. Let's allow him to live in absolute splendor with unfathomable wealth and resources. He can travel the world with a stupid hat on his wretchedly sinful head that indicates that he is the 'Vicar of Christ'. Let's even give him a bulletproof 'popemobile' to ride around in. Let's adore him, kiss his ring, fall at his feet and cry when we see him. Let's consider his every utterance to be an edict from God. Let's decide what's right and what's wrong, what's sinful and what's not sinful based on his wretched, sinful, mortal judgement. Let's ignore or blow off the history of his office and the historically corrupt organization he represents.

Now let's call him "THE HOLY FATHER".

I strongly suspect they will prosper.

I have known hundreds (thousands?) of homeschooled kids through the years. None of them are as isolated as you describe. Some are more social than others but all of them interact with lots of people. Most are exposed to a variety of people and age groups every day of their lives because they are not stifled in a classroom full of the same people day after day, year after year. They are out and about with their families and friends learning how to live life and do things.

If I understand DSY correctly, these kids would be better off warehoused all day in a room full of others their same age with similar backgrounds, drugged into submission with Ritalin and indoctrinated in Godless humanism. After they make it past the metal detector at the front door they can be taught that they evolved from apes and that sodomy is normal, acceptable behavior. Premarital sex is inevitable, kid, so here's some condoms. NO THANKS.

The fact that this arrogant, vacuous, power hungry political opportunist can say something so blatently vile without losing the support of millions speaks volumes about the sad state of this country. I wonder how many people who call themselves Christians will continue to support this empty egotist in spite of his blasphemy.

I have never trusted Obama and have always believed he was up to something. Now every time I see him he makes me sick.

http://www.tollelegepress.com/gb/geneva.php

Here's a good review of it:

There is an awful lot of evidence from an enormous number of reputable sources that back up Neil's opinion. Abe Lincoln dodn't live that long ago and many of his contemporaries thought he was a semi-religious agnostic (for lack of a better term) at best.

I bought my wife a new Taurus in 2004 and it STAYED at the dealership for service. I was so glad when she finally totaled it (but I'm glad she wasn't hurt, of course).

The shirt says: "sermonaudio.com - faith cometh by hearing". It and many others are available in the SermonAudio store (it's run by Cafe Press). I have a bunch of them. I run in the long sleeve t-shirt during the winter. I have one of the SermonAudio wall clocks here over my PC. I keep my pens in a SermonAudio coffee cup.

http://www.cafepress.com/sermonaudio

I shop at Walmart, too. I don't, however, wear anything that exploits Christ or Scripture like the shirts you are referring to. There is a stand-alone shop at the mall that I was in today that sells those shirts. The 'Christian' book shops here sell them, too. I think they are wrong and many of them border on being downright blasphemous.

What? Am I missing something? I don't think you and I have spoken in a long time. I hope I haven't posted something that upset you that I'm not remembering. I certainly didn't intend to if I did.

Haven't you said here previously that you have been married three times?