|
|
USER COMMENTS BY B MCCAUSLAND |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 14 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
10/2/2020 7:29 PM |
B. McCausland | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mike wrote: 1. I know of only one on SA who has said the virus is a hoax. Watchmanremo. 2. The deception is not in the existence, but in the responses, ... 1. Thanks for the clarification 2. And the origins perhaps besides the overall withheld information |
|
|
9/10/2020 3:15 PM |
B. McCausland | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: ... she is a nominal Christian, like so many Americans ... never born again, never showed any evidence of being indwelt by the Spirit, never bore any fruit unto eternal life. These sort of people are bold, they make bold speeches, they censure others who genuinely stand with God, they promote sin, they bolster the LGBT cause, they divorce, thinking it to be all right, but contrary to what Jesus taught. "Everybody's doing it, right? Must be okay!" This woman ... is nothing special, just another rebel. But she writes books, she preaches, and that makes her dangerous. Sure, barren Christianity abounds, result of false gospel pulpit 'talks' and esay belivism. How true Adam Clarke had it, even 2 centuries ago.Surely I Corinthians 5 deals with the necessity of church discipline, "Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. " |
|
|
8/28/2020 4:54 PM |
B. McCausland | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Chrisgp from England wrote: ... here in Britain. There is virtually no resistance to the government requirements for churches, and has not been since March. Some have even at times exceeded the guidelines. An exception is one church in south London, where the congregation have refused to observe the singing ban, and have sung the hymns and songs, though I don’t know whether they have gone in with the other rules or not. More typical is my church that I finally was able to visit for the 1st time since March with tape, sealed off pews one way systems,, no fellowship allowed, no singing, recorded hymns played over a loudspeaker, masks, etc., or even worse, a large church near me with big posters declaring Jesus as “Name above all Names” and “Need of our Nation”, but had been totally locked up, and still is since March, (no online services either), and three photos of the pastor wearing a mask, with a text, “Wear this for your own protection and for others”! And when will the church beg God to stay away this evil tide? "Resist the devil ... " This can be done through prayer Compliance is all the modern church knowsMike Sure a pathological germ killing less than 0.02% frightening so much! Or, is there something else? |
|
|
8/28/2020 4:42 PM |
B. McCausland | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: I wonder if these are attacks by the religious or the atheists. Either way, it is not sensible, showing the unregenerate bent towards sin. Neither, organized propaganda |
|
|
8/16/2020 10:25 PM |
B. McCausland | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Frank wrote: If someone believes it is a sin to drink alcohol, it is a sin. If they do not think that, then it isn't Situational ethics accomodate truthMS "Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God. Happy is he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth. And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eats not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin." What is considered sin in this passage is doubting about the matter, not taking a stand about the issue. 'Opinions' are not biblical. They are a humanistic devise to accomodate truth in order to make us all feel happy with whatever take we incline to. It is pluralism. The word is yeah, yeah, and nay, nay, and whatever else comes from it out of that is sin. We are called to keep unity in truth. "... he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, ... Till we all come in the unity of the faith" Instead of entertaining opinions we are to endeavour to "... walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called, With all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love; Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. |
|
|
8/16/2020 9:56 PM |
B. McCausland | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
hey_yo wrote: 1. 1 Corinthians 2:8-14 ... God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: ... we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; ... But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.2. The quiet Christian wrote, ... mystery to me is how and why the Lord would permit those whom He has redeemed to have differences of opinion 1. Thank you 2. QC The assumption is that because as believers we have the unction from on high, say the Spirit of God in us, we are always walking in the Spirit as a given, and not ever yielding to our own understanding. This is a fallacy. Hence dogmatism over different takes, often root not out from the Spirit, but from our own past baggage, or from our own sinful tendencies and hearts that condone fleshly attitudes or conditioned understanding. Then we like to name such as 'opinions' to allow us all be right. Then such called opinions are held as sacred untouchable valid assumptions. |
|
|
8/16/2020 9:21 PM |
B. McCausland | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Frank wrote: 1. ... Every man at the beginning does set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now ... v.10 will only be understood by someone who understands the effect of real alcohol2. Christ made real alcohol; not grape juice. 3. “... Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners 4. ... wisdom is justified of her children” 5. ... winebibber means a drunkard ... they saw Christ ... drink alcohol. 6. If ... drinking a form of grape juice 7. Christ never drank to excess. 8. If someone believes it is a sin to drink alcohol, it is a sin. If they do not think that, then it isn't. Drunkenness being the serious issue it is in our society and for enlightenment of any new stopping by, a check of half truths, rabbit trails and presumptions argued upon.1. False assumption that bad or good wine is determined by intoxicating power. 2.&6. Not stated 3. So by Christ's critics mouth is is implied that he sinned as a 'gluttonous' 4. The acts of those practicing wisdom become obvious by the results 5. Nazerite abstinence context missing 7. Dituled domestic wine could hardly get a man drunk 8. Situational ethics |
|
|
8/16/2020 4:16 PM |
B. McCausland | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Frank wrote: ... And no one should ever drink to excess unless they fit BM's comment. Truth always comes with two wings, and certainly 'winebibbers' will hold to one wing of it at the excess, or neglect of the other. But "wisdom" is justified of her children." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|