"The confirmation debate surrounding President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch highlighted the perennial dispute between adherents of “Originalism” and supporters of a “Living Constitution” over how judges should interpret the U.S. Constitution. Despite this disagreement, however, there has been no dispute that judicial decisions must rest on a strong foundation: the facts of the case, the judicial precedents that make up the relevant case law, and a rational analysis linking the two. In an alarming turn, however, even this basic premise is being challenged by imperious and unaccountable judges that are even getting the facts wrong."
Featuring a sermon puts it on the front page of the site and is the most effective way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands including all mobile platforms + newsletter.
Text-Featuring a sermon is a less expensive way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands on the right bar with optional newsletter inclusion. As low as $30/day.