Argument 3 Infant Baptisers Claim that the Church Is the Same in Both Testaments
This is a third way in which infant baptisers try to support their practice, and it is closely allied to their flawed view of the covenant arising out of their mistake over the continuity/discontinuity of the Testaments.1 Contending that the church is the same in both Testaments, they consequently argue that what circumcision was in the Old Testament, baptism is in the New. Baptism, they say, has replaced circumcision. That being so, they go on to argue that since infants were circumcised in the Old Testament church, as they put it, infants ought to be baptised in the New Testament church.
Featuring a sermon puts it on the front page of the site and is the most effective way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands including all mobile platforms + newsletter.
Text-Featuring a sermon is a less expensive way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands on the right bar with optional newsletter inclusion. As low as $30/day.
“ Great Sermon! ” Excellent book on Infant baptism. Highly recommend this 8 chapter book for anyone that has contact or discussion with Infant baptizers or just wants a more comprehensive understanding of the differences of the two beliefs on baptism.
