As we have seen, Acts 16 is the passage Evans chose to use to set out what he considers to be the major scriptural justification for his thesis. Very well. In the previous chapter, ‘What of Scripture?', I looked in some detail at this. But as I noted at the time, Evans does not seem to find anything in Acts 17:16-34 (nor, for that matter, in Acts 14:8-20) worth using for his purpose. I realise, of course, that no writer can include everything, but surely Evans should have at least mentioned these two passages? I would put it stronger. In the present context, nothing could be more relevant than these two passages (especially Acts 17:16-34), passages in which we have the record of Paul dealing with pagans – religious pagans. How much more relevant could we get?
Featuring a sermon puts it on the front page of the site and is the most effective way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands including all mobile platforms + newsletter.
Text-Featuring a sermon is a less expensive way to bring this sermon to the attention of thousands on the right bar with optional newsletter inclusion. As low as $30/day.
“ Relationship Evangelism Exposed. (Audio+ PDF) ” A most important publication concerning today's climate in Evangelism. This is a very helpful in-depth examination of the popular and most alarming trend amongst many evangelical and reformed as well as the more liberal churches. The great need for us, of course, is to consider . 'What saith the Scripture?'.
Here we have a faithful and thorough investigation of the matter- well supported by Scripture and other relevant sources.
Thank you brother, for your laborious work in exposing this wretched ' blight' by the clear light of Scripture - it will we pray, prove a very valuable resource for any who truly love the Word of Truth, and the One who spake it.
