Plot thickens over origins of pope’s civil union endorsement
Question swirled Thursday about the origins of Pope Francis’ bombshell comments endorsing same-sex civil unions, with all evidence suggesting he made them in a 2019 interview that was never broadcast in its entirety.
The Vatican refused to comment on whether it cut the remarks from its own broadcast or pressured the Mexican broadcaster that conducted the interview to follow suit. And it didn’t respond to questions about why it allowed the comments to be aired now in the documentary “Francesco,” which premiered Wednesday....
It sits better , to say they believe in queer marriage, when they can have shelled out millions of dollars on priests who have had sex with anything that ever went to catechism class If the Catholic Church wasn’t worth billions, they would have shut the doors and disbanded the church forever.
If, as has been stated, the Vatican has many sodomite priests perhaps the Pope is trying to gain more support by encouraging their hopes for a queer future in the RCC.
Francis has probably copied these ideas from the Democrats who will do anything for a vote. (Liberalists believe that religion has nothing to do with morals in society)
And PC Liberalism is spreading through many other main stream churches such as Anglican and Episcopalian etc. After all, a little sin concession may increase the numbers in the pews.
Neil wrote: No pope is worthy of commendation by a Bible believer, but an ostensible conservative is worse since foolish "Protestants" are more likely to consider them political allies, whereas a herd-following LGBT sympathizer would put them off. Or do you really want another Innocent III, who humbled even King John of England? "The best of popes is the worst of popes."
Well said Neil! The RCC rarely denies a homosexual priest’s confirmation; all they ask for is they claim they are celibate and will remain celibate. But, as we all know that doesn’t take place. Being a priest gives them access to each other and also children. All they do is confess what they have done to each other; say their penance and then they simply continue. And of course a priest isn’t supposed to share these confessions with anyone.
My parents talked about me becoming an altar boy; thank God that didn’t occur.
I knew a fellow in Germany who was molested by his priest as a pre-teen. He told his mother and she told him not to repeat it to anyone else because of the damage it would do to the RCC.
John Yurich USA wrote: It is time that Francis be replaced with a conservative ...
No pope is worthy of commendation by a Bible believer, but an ostensible conservative is worse since foolish "Protestants" are more likely to consider them political allies, whereas a herd-following LGBT sympathizer would put them off.
Or do you really want another Innocent III, who humbled even King John of England? "The best of popes is the worst of popes."
This helps the RCC with the abusive priest problem. It takes it out of the abuse category and places it into the loving category. Viola, no more child abusers.
Jim Lincoln wrote: There are a whole lot of queer priests in the Romish Church e.g. "Four in five Vatican priests are gay, book claims" https://tinyurl.com/y5wruw3w So it's not much of a surprise About Pope Francis announcement.
It is time that Francis be replaced with a conservative who will kick out of the priesthood every fruitcake priest so that there are only heterosexual priests.
A good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart brings forth evil. For out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks. Luke 6:45
The origin of the pope's endorsement of sin is his evil heart which then manifest itself through his mouth by what he says.