Media Pounces on Trump Video, Ignores Same-day Disclosures of Clinton Corruption
A large number of controversial and important items relative to the upcoming election were released Friday. Almost all of them dealt with the corruption, double-dealing, and dishonesty of Hillary Clinton. But one of them was the inflammatory video of Donald Trump discussing his views on women as objects of sexual prey. The mainstream media has largely ignored the lion’s share of the releases (dealing with Hillary) to focus on the 11-year-old, three-minute-long video of Donald Trump expressing a lowbrow, Neanderthalic attitude toward women, when he was recorded on a live mike without his knowledge.
The video immediately became a major campaign issue when it was released Friday. However, while the mainstream media pounced on this story, the same media sources have been largely silent about the many documents WikiLeaks released the same day that reflect badly on Hillary Clinton.
What does Mrs Bill Clinton really believe? Does she have strong beliefs about anything? A new raft of emails from the Mrs Bill Clinton camp give us reason to think it depends on what the meaning of "is",is.
The propaganda "news" suppressed documents show the Mrs Bill Clinton advisors carefully and meticulously messaging the Mrs Bill Clinton position on a wide range of issues -- on everything from the Keystone pipeline to the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA). As they emailed back and forth, the advisors carefully weighed the costs and benefits (in terms of votes, campaign contributions and favorable or unfavorable publicity) of nuanced positions. On a great many issues, Mrs Bill Clinton has changed her positon – including Sodomite "marriage" the TPPA and the pipeline – over the nine-year period covered by the emails. The Clinton advisors anguish over how to position theses changes without appearing to be “cynically” chasing votes or giving the appearance of “putting a finger to the wind.”
But there appears to be no email exchange where anyone discusses what Mrs Bill Clinton actually believes about any issue at all- Mrs Bill Clinton has been exposed to have no core, to be someone who constantly changes her position to maximize political gaIn. Triangulation.
Maxwellcool wrote: Mr.Trump has "Some very powerful refutations of the latest abuse accusations"....Really!!!. I think we as Christians have lost the moral campus and just follow the flock! How about the Video???. How about those women???...Its a total disgrace even to mention about Trump!!!
The theme of this discussion is whether Clinton receives bias from the media, not to discuss the Sainthood of Trump
Listening to the mainscream media, one might think accusation is enough to convict Trump, while actual evidence against Clinton is not enough for them to make known to the public.
Mr.Trump has "Some very powerful refutations of the latest abuse accusations"....Really!!!. I think we as Christians have lost the moral campus and just follow the flock! How about the Video???. How about those women???...Its a total disgrace even to mention about Trump!!!
The Trump Campaign has offered some very powerful refutations of the latest abuse accusations. It will be interesting to see if the major news outlets even mention them. The refutations are by witnesses, airline logs, concert dates and emails by the accusers
Jim Lincoln wrote: --- (Why I Just Quit the Republican Party)[/URL] This knowledgeable people recognize. You mystify me, Mike, I consider you much too smart to be Trump man?
No mystery, Jim. I haven't been a Republican for decades, because most are not knowledgeable. Your congressman proves it. Nor am I a Trump man. I would have preferred Ben Carson. But I do try to ferret out the truth, and absolutely hate deception and manipulation, which is going on full force in the media, and among other Clinton apologists, who live in blindness. They self-righteously hold Trump's potty mouth as evidence of unfitness, but ignore Clinton's evil deeds? What stupidity! I guess I just don't want to be part of the destruction.
Ever wonder where their moral high ground comes from, in light of all the perversity they promote? You see, they don't actually care what Trump says, they want Clinton in, because she promotes perversity, too. She's one of them. It's simple, Jim.
Mike, well one thing he's an actual Republican, not the "millions?" who joined the Republican party to push for a demagogue [URL=http://tinyurl.com/zbp5w7p]]]http://tinyurl.com/zbp5w7p (USA TODAY's Editorial Board: Trump is 'unfit for the presidency'[/URL]. But as Daniel Pipes pointed out,
Daniel Pipes wrote: Fourth, the conservative movement, to which I belong, has developed since the 1950s into a major intellectual force. It did so by building on several key ideas (limited government, a moral order, and a foreign policy reflecting American interests and values). But the cultural abyss and constitutional nightmare of a Trump presidency will likely destroy this delicate creation. Ironically, although a Hillary Clinton presidency threatens bad Supreme Court justices, it leaves the conservative movement intact.
Finally, Trump is "an ignorant, amoral, dishonest and manipulative, misogynistic, philandering, hyper-litigious, isolationist, protectionist blowhard" in the words of Republican donor Michael K. Vlock.
[URL=http://tinyurl.com/z92bhus]]]http://tinyurl.com/z92bhus (Why I Just Quit the Republican Party)[/URL] This knowledgeable people recognize. You mystify me, Mike, I consider you much too smart to be Trump man?
Jim Lincoln wrote: --- What my Republican Congressman said about DT, excerpt from, (Nebraska lawmakers add voices to call for Trump to quitGood going, Jeff
Why should your congressman's voice count more than the millions of voices that want Trump to continue? I thought you liked democracy in action, Jim. Didn't realize weak-kneed Republicans, scurrying to their holes in fear were your cup of soy milk. Maybe they can put up yet another "moderate" like the last three, and lose it yet again. A shame they never learn a thing. But they would rather not rock the boat, continue in second place so they can continue to blame the democrat president, while continuing to do nothing about it. Hey, it's good pay, benefits, and retirement, right? Who cares if nothing good gets done?
Opinionated wrote: Then do your own research into past positions of each candidate. You'll probably find that he did not tell the truth about 99% of the questions. Also, it might be that tomorrow he'll say that the 1% was a fault of the microphone. Or, one of his surrogates will say that the answer he gave, the one seemingly true, was not what he really meant.
Why opinionated what a refreshing post Politifact does have files on both these characters, [URL=http://tinyurl.com/pspfvgp]]]http://tinyurl.com/pspfvgp (Hillary Clinton's file)[/URL] and [URL=http://tinyurl.com/n9qvuhp]]]http://tinyurl.com/n9qvuhp (Donald Trump's file)[/URL].
What my Republican Congressman said about DT,
Congressman Jeff Fortenberry wrote: As Americans we are faced with two strikingly bad choices: Donald Trump, who has abused women, and Hillary Clinton who has enabled the abuse of women. It's all wrong. For my part, I ask that Donald Trump step aside and allow Mike Pence to become the Republican nominee.
excerpt from, [URL=http://tinyurl.com/gqyxutl]]]http://tinyurl.com/gqyxutl (Nebraska lawmakers add voices to call for Trump to quit)[/URL]. Good going, Jeff
The left wing-nut media will be pulling out all the stops to help Hillary Clinton step into the White House ––– radicals are attempting to hijack America once again and if they get away with it this time shame on us
Mike wrote: When did Trump become a believer? Does 98% sound like a real number to you? As for Fact Check, it is a project of the Annenberg Foundation. Their photography project is presently involved with this, from their website: "Conceived to illuminate the breakthroughs of marginalized communities, IDENTITY: Timothy Greenfield-Sanders The List Portraits is comprised of 151 uniquely compelling large-format photographs of pioneers in five distinct-but-often-overlapping groups. Each installment (The Black List, The Latino List, The Women’s List, The Out List and The Trans List" Now there's some God honoring going on there isn't there? Sounds like divide the groups and conquer, and simultaneously include the perverse. Maybe they have other reason to oppose Trump than "facts." Maybe they want Clinton to win. Hmmm.
Then do your own research into past positions of each candidate. You'll probably find that he did not tell the truth about 99% of the questions. Also, it might be that tomorrow he'll say that the 1% was a fault of the microphone. Or, one of his surrogates will say that the answer he gave, the one seemingly true, was not what he really meant.
I agree with Wayfarer Pilgrim. This whole election and the state of our nation are sickening. I will hold my nose when I vote for Trump or fast/pray if Jezebel wins.
penned wrote: it is unprecedented that a competitor for an election would have to stare down the opponent and say I'd have to put legal charges on you...
Great point, Sis. Pennny!
Wayfarer Pilgrim wrote: I have wrestled and compromised and just can't ignore the prodding of the Holy Spirit that is giving me pause from voting for Trump. I can't say why, it's just a sick feeling I have in voting for either candidate.
Opinionated wrote: And Christians are sinning by not separating from the world system
Sounds like excuse for hiding salt and light behind the meetinghouse doors, while bemoaning the state of the world. Christians are called to a spiritual, not a physical separation.
Opinionated, that's a pretty ignorant question, you clearly do not have respect for them. and the fact checks are a bunch of malarkey, you aren't pulling wool over anyone's eyes. by the way, Hillary was head of state, remember Benghazi? why was a stand down given? it was a CIA facility, they were running arms at that time in their future preparations to take down Syria. sent them through turkey. all this has come out over time. but I knew they would try to destroy Syria many years ago because the neocons had a list of countries they would invade and Wesley clark spoke about that list years ago. other than mass decapitations of Christians, what more smearing can we come up with of irrelevant topics while Europe falls to sharia? neocons better wake up, your civilization was on the list too. if the media was doing sound reporting there would be no issue here. the woman who created ISIS and the man who wants to stop ISIS, its your choice. those with sound minds want to stop ISIS. who would've ever thought Christians would want otherwise?
Opinionated wrote: --- The Fact Check disclosed that Trump did not tell the truth about 98% of the questions asked last evening. Now, again, when will the words of our mouths and the meditations of our hearts be God-honoring?
When did Trump become a believer? Does 98% sound like a real number to you? As for Fact Check, it is a project of the Annenberg Foundation. Their photography project is presently involved with this, from their website:
"Conceived to illuminate the breakthroughs of marginalized communities, IDENTITY: Timothy Greenfield-Sanders The List Portraits is comprised of 151 uniquely compelling large-format photographs of pioneers in five distinct-but-often-overlapping groups. Each installment (The Black List, The Latino List, The Women’s List, The Out List and The Trans List"
Now there's some God honoring going on there isn't there? Sounds like divide the groups and conquer, and simultaneously include the perverse. Maybe they have other reason to oppose Trump than "facts." Maybe they want Clinton to win. Hmmm.
pennelope wrote: ....its about time! endorsed by 200 generals and admirals border patrol union endorsement ice, police endorsements those on frontline might be trying to say something?
200 hundred generals out of how many?
Sounds like those in the true "front line" is warning you of imprisonment awaiting the majority of us, especially those posting Biblical views.
The Fact Check disclosed that Trump did not tell the truth about 98% of the questions asked last evening.
Now, again, when will the words of our mouths and the meditations of our hearts be God-honoring?
Opinionated wrote: And Christians are sinning by not separating from the world system
Not that's a bold statement.
What "world system" exactly are you referring to? Are you suggesting that political activism is sinful? Or voting for the lesser of two evils is sin? Or maybe its just voting in federal elections that is sinful? How about voting for school board members? Or city council members?
How about some biblical texts to back that up? Or is your opinion good enough?
ladybug wrote: Most here know there's no such thing as a sinless candidate, I don't think any are looking for such a person. What many need to understand is- that God gives wicked leadership as judgment; when a nation is vile and wicked as America is, why should we expect leadership that is any different? Trump may not be as dangerous as Clinton, but then again, he may be worse. Both candidates are frightening, but we have to look past that and consider the real problem, and it isn't political. America is seeped in sin, in false Christianity, in shallow preaching. Goats posing as sheep, methods added to the Gospel that make it null and void. Doctrine ignored and Christians having a half inch-deep grip on truth. There is a famine in the land, a famine of biblical truth. There is no power in much of the preaching, lukewarmness permeates many churches. Being busy in activities but lacking understanding in truth does not make disciples of Christ. As Calvin rightly stated, "For since a wicked prince is the Lord’s scourge to punish the sins of the people, let us remember, that it happens through our fault that this excellent blessing of God is turned into a curse."
And Christians are sinning by not separating from the world system
Dr. Joel Beeke | 11/11/2012
COMMENTS 
locked 
System Notice
You see, they don't actually care what Trump says, they want Clinton in, because she promotes perversity, too. She's one of them. It's simple, Jim.
