|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ NOBODY ” |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
| · Page 1 · Found: 16 user comments posted recently. |
|
|
 6/9/15 11:51 AM |
| Nobody | | Anywhere | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
I Told You So Long Ago wrote:
"DENNIS HASTERT HIRES HIGH-POWERED LAWYER THOMAS GREEN
By Tracy Connor (6-8-15, 7:29 pm et)
Former House Speaker DENNIS HASTERT Has Hired A High-Powered Washington Attorney Who Is A Veteran Of Political Scandals To Represent HIM Against Federal Charges That HE Lied To The FBI About Bank Withdrawals—Money HE Allegedly Used As Payoffs To Keep Sexual Misconduct Accusations Under Wraps. I Told You So Long Ago,
If God marked iniquity, who could stand?
May Hassert receive mercy from the Righteoius Judge.
2 Samuel 24:14 And David said unto Gad, I am in a great strait: let us fall now into the hand of the LORD; for his mercies are great: and let me not fall into the hand of man.
God told us so long ago. |
|
|
| 6/9/15 11:22 AM |
| Nobody | | Anywhere | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
I Told You So Long Ago wrote:
"DENNIS HASTERT HIRES HIGH-POWERED LAWYER THOMAS GREEN
By Tracy Connor (6-8-15, 7:29 pm et)
Former House Speaker DENNIS HASTERT Has Hired A High-Powered Washington Attorney Who Is A Veteran Of Political Scandals To Represent HIM Against Federal Charges That HE Lied To The FBI About Bank Withdrawals—Money HE Allegedly Used As Payoffs To Keep Sexual Misconduct Accusations Under Wraps.
THOMAS GREEN Of The White-Shoe Firm SIDNEY AUSTIN—Where ["]PRESIDENT["] And MICHELLE OBAMA Worked As Young Lawyers—Will Represent HASTERT At HIS Arraignment On Tuesday, Which Will Mark THE POL's First Public Appearance Since HIS Indictment Nearly Two Weeks Earlier.
HASTERT, A REPUBLICAN Who Retired From Congress In 2007 And Became A Lobbyist, Is Accused Of Structuring Bank Transactions To Avoid Triggering Red Flags [On HIS Alledged
SODOMIZING-SEX-ABUSE COVER-UP]"-NBC-NEWS I Told You So Long Ago,and Christ told us as well as demonstrate that God is kind. It is because of the Lord's mercies that we are not consumed. If God marked iniquity, who could stand? I thank God for imputing His righteousness to me. It is not burdensome to tell you this again, I Told You So Long Ago. May God grant you more of His grace. |
|
|
 10/2/13 9:31 PM |
|
• Add new comment
|
“ Great Sermon! ”
I wish this could be preached every time. It would be a mercy to His "poor and needy" (spiritually p & N) |
|
|
| 4/30/11 4:51 PM |
| nobody | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Were there Christians in the Anglican Church at its beginning and a few scattered throughout it's history, yes, but was it ever Christian, no. "He did so; delivered him to the secular power, who on the very same day led the blind boy (Thomas Drowry) to the place of execution at Gloucester, together with one Thomas Croker, a poor bricklayer, condemned also for the like testimony of the truth; when both, in one fire, most constantly and joyfully yielded their souls into the hands of the Lord Jesus." (scionofzion.com)Jim
Thomas Drowry was a simple blind peasant boy who was burned at the stake for rejecting the Roman Catholic mass and its heresy. Thomas Croker again a simple bricklayer was burned for rejecting the Roman Catholic heresies. They, by the grace of God were Anglicans. Tell me Jim, have any of the IHCC members ever taken God's Holy Word to the point where they have given their life for it? Can you justify, before God, the statement which you declare, 'that you and your brothers are better than the Anglican's?' Where is the real struggle today? |
|
|
| 1/29/09 11:23 AM |
| nobody | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Neil wrote:
You have a point there. I was assuming attendees were no more heedful of the duty to tithe than of other Scriptural injunctions, yet pastors tend to teach about tithing far more thoroughly than other subjects. I agree, Neil. It's interesting that pastors who hold to "Grace, grace, all is grace," and indulge the sins of the sinner because it's all been paid for at the cross, and holiness and righteousness will come sometime in the future - but, not now! For these pastors to call for obedience in moral issues is sheer blasphemy - those cursed works - trying to add to one's salvation! How dare they! These same pastors seem to fail to understand that that mindset correspondingly translates to one's giving of tithes and offerings. The faithful give in good times and bad. The unfaithful give out of surplus, and most of the time not in proportion to their assets. In times of tightening the belt, it would seem that the tithe would be the first to go. He who is faithful in little (that would include every area of life), will be faithful in much. |
|
|
| 1/29/09 9:40 AM |
| nobody | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Michael Hranek wrote:
"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved!" This prompts the better question - "Who is the believer?" Would those who hold to correct doctrine be the only ones saved? Or, would those who know only that a Saviour came to die for the sins of man, and the person who repents of his sins? Aren't we told that even the devils believe, but are not saved? So, rather than the division being doctrinally debated. Why wouldn't the better debate be - "Who is a Christian?" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
