Dr. Tim wrote:
Who wouldn’t admire an angel with “moron” in his name?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/was-it-ok-for-trump-to-sign-bibles-in-alabama-visit-religious-leaders-weigh-in

Personally, I wouldn't have let my Bible be signed, but the survivors had asked the president to sign theirs or hats or other items.

Plain Old Tim wrote:
If he had said he burns the flag and spits on the cross he would have been hailed as a hero by the Democraps.

John Yurich USA wrote:
Pastor would agree with me about not having any use for Francis.
NeedHim, I do not know anybody at that Baptist Church I attend on Sunday mornings who also attends the local Catholic parish for Saturday Mass.

"There is a married couple who attend and are on the membership roll of that Baptist church who also attend and belong to the local Catholic parish. They were also Baptized via immersion at that Baptist church. I do not hold any false doctrines."

Above quote by JY via a Baptist message board with the topic he started entitled, "Are There Any Catholics On This Forum?"
June 15, 2017, post #119

Not that it matters much, but here's my thoughts:

1)
Perhaps those two RCC members only attend mass every Monday through Friday or they sit, unseen, on the opposite side of that church on Saturdays to avoid JY.

2)
As to the claim of not holding any false doctrines, JY has previously stated that he made up his own doctrine in order to justify his personal belief in infant baptism (which is NOT biblical).

“So I was wondering where they got that idea—they talked about control of the money, we didn’t have control of the money,” Moore said. “Anyway, to make a long story short, they kind of failed. So about 30 days before the general election, just the other day, the Washington Post published another attack on my character and reputation because they are desperate to stop my political campaign. These attacks said I was with a minor child and are false and untrue—and for which they will be sued.”

November 11, 2017
By Daniel John Sobieski

"It was dĂŠjĂ  vu all over again as the Washington Post, who has endorsed his opponent in the Alabama Senate race, brought forth 40-year-old sexual molestation accusations against Judge Roy Moore. From Clarence Thomas, to the Duke lacrosse team, to the University of Virginia rape case, to Herman Cain, we have heard such charges before and the rush to judgment that follows."

ladybug wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/10/roy-moore-accuser-worked-for-clinton-campaign-as-interpreter-reports-say.html

Constans wrote:
So, what does Dec. 25th have to do with Jesus Christ? Honest question.

http://doctorwoodhead.com/nimrod-the-founder-of-the-occult-and-babylon/

Ivan Karamazov wrote:
👇 this guy seriously cracks me up 😂

Jim Lincoln wrote:

One might give us a major new source that said that Merck did this❗

And by the way, are you one of those 'keyboard warriors' who gets paid-by-the-post to infiltrate Christian and conservative sites in order to push Gyorgy's demonic, globalist agenda?

Christopher000 wrote:
.....An usher behind me was whispering, but loudly enough that I heard him say to the other: "He's only giving two dollars". I looked back and they were both looking directly at me...

Dr. Tim wrote:
American trolls haven't exactly been idle either.

Mike wrote:
Chris, there was a Graham quote from 50 years ago in which he felt infant baptism meant something. Come to think of it, it was a lot fewer than that number of years ago, I believed it, too. Hope I'm not quoted on it as a way to discredit everything else I've ever said or done.

"I do believe that something happens at the baptism of an infant, particularly if the parents are Christians and teach their children Christian truths from childhood. We cannot fully understand the mysteries of God. But I believe that a miracle can happen in these children so that they are regenerated, that is, made Christians through infant baptism. If you want to call that baptismal regeneration, that's all right with me."

(Billy Graham, interviewed by Wilfred Bockelman, assoc. editor of the Lutheran Standard, American Lutheran Church, Lutheran Standard, October 10, 1961).

That statement was also quoted by Time Magazine, Vol. 78, October 27, 1961. It can be read only by subscription here:
(Look for the article entitled: "Religion: For Adults Only?")

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601611027,00.html

A tiny, free peek at the article can be found here:

Dave wrote:
Agreed KD,
But be careful using such scriptures around here.
There's judaisers here that'll tell us we're wrong

Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ."

John Yurich USA wrote:
It is not just for this forums benefit but also for other forums also. It is not a lie. I no longer consider myself to be Catholic even if I attend Mass every weekend. I consider myself to be Baptist only now.

Getting baptized at that hotel pool in May did not make you a Baptist - at that time what it did was make you a wet Catholic.

For years and in your own words, you have repeatedly stated you were/are a Catholic. That is, until you went after Frank and had your comment deleted...

Could it be you've now changed your tune since your post was removed and you're now trying to buffalo the moderator(s) via gaslighting as you do at other forums?

Playing along with your "I'm now a Baptist" comment, does this mean you will now put more than a nickel in the collection plate once a month at the Baptist Church or will you be a cheerful giver and put in two whole nickels?

You should be cheerful considering all that free food you eat after the Baptist church services.