Lurker wrote:
Evasive and irrelevant to your dogmatic erroneous statement
"lurker": YOU Say "Evasive and irrelevant to your dogmatic erroneous statement" !I Say That YOU, "lurker", ARE The One Who IS EVASIVE And ERRONEOUS To YOUR DOGMATIC ERRONEOUS STATEMENT, FALSE ALLUSION & ACCUSATION THAT I'm "Evasive and (My Statement & Words) irrelevant" TO THE FALSELY PERCEIVED "erroneous statement" THAT YOU THINK THAT I'VE MADE !
The Historic FACT Is That THE "GENEVA-BIBLE" OR "BREECHES-BIBLE" WAS INDEED TRANSLATED FROM THE LATIN VULGATE--But Not JUST The Latin-Vulgate ALONE !
Why Do You Think The "Disclaiming" &-Or Further "Clarifying" Statement, "and conferred with the beft translations in diuers languages (i.e. THE LATIN VULGATE)", Was Written On The First Page Of THE 1599 GENEVA BIBLE ?
The Word "conferred", "consulted" &-Or "compared" Is Also Alluded To & Used In THE KING JAMES BIBLES' TITLE PAGE:
"& with the former Translations (i.e. The Geneva's, Bishop's, Coverdale's & Tyndale's Bibles; And, Etc.) diligently compared and revised," !
*THE GENEVA-"BIBLE" WAS NOT A PURE & COMPLETE HOLY-BIBLE, LIKE THE KJB, WITH JUST THE WORDS OF GOD TRANSLATED THEREIN: BUT CONTAINED THE UN-HOLY-SPIRIT-INSPIRED "CALVINIST" OPINIONS & "DOCTRINES" OF MEN !