And don't forget Christian persecution in the united states of America, particular from tax terrorists and child predator service terrorists. While you all are arguing about some stupid puppet president or watching some stupid game, children are being stolen and abused everyday, even from believers.
"Because humanity is what it is, because we're such selfish, easily corruptible beings, the American system doesn't work. The Constitution doesn't work. Replace everyone in Washington with "decent folks" like you and me. Shrink the size of the federal government to what it was 200 years ago. Start completely over, and WE'D EVENTUALLY FIND OURSELVES IN THIS EXACT SAME PREDICAMENT. The answer then is not to reform this failed, evil system. The answer is to ABOLISH IT. Decentralize, get rid of the Constitution, at the very least return to the Articles of Confederation. "And this is why I don't vote. Because voting just grants legitimacy to the slave masters and their wicked system. By voting, we give them the right to claim that they're just doing our will. Representative democracy and all that [bullstuff]. "It's time to stop playing their game. It's time to do all we can to undermine their tyranny and fight for liberty." Remember this and the Nock quotes for the coming "revolution" or changes or whatever the they people have planned. It's quite obvious that the they people are intentionally making people angry with "government."
Forced vaccination, not immunization. There's a difference.
But any forcing is for citizens of the State, not for citizens of the kingdom of heaven.
Anne wrote: pen, yes he does. He has repeatedly voiced his plans for forced immunization. SDA's perform abortions in their hospitals as well so they don't have an aversion to using fetal cells in vacc serums. Now, should they ever discover that any swine serum has been added... well, them are fightin' words!
Oh, and another insult UP, especially by professed believers, is when they ask how are your children going to learn anything if they don't go to school or do some curriculum. But if I turn it around and say something similar about schooled children and their parents, then I'm a bad guy and judgmental and unsaved......
jules wrote: You don't need a regime or strict copy of theschooling system to teach your children. Let your home be a home where teaching comes naturally not as a dreaded time
Jimmie's link to the idiotic Satanist is a good example, "Unprofitable Servant", of why I use such language to describe certain people and the things they believe and do. Vaccination is child abuse and vaccinators and those who offer their children to the vaccinators are child abusers. There should be no choice at all. The satanic practice needs to be abolished!
Jim Lincoln wrote: Of course, [URL=http://www.dallasnews.com/news/columnists/jacquielynn-floyd/20150205-withholding-vaccinations-is-a-form-of-child-abuse.ece]]]http://www.dallasnews.com/news/columnists/jacquielynn-floyd/20150205-withholding-vaccinations-is-a-form-of-child-abuse.ece[/URL]
Dylan, tell me how to get into Paraguay. It appears that country is also hostile to believers.
Jojo wrote: "Rom 1:32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are WORTHY OF DEATH, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Dam right the NT supports killing such baby murderers, it is the ONLY solution. War is the ONLY answer in such countries, or move to other countries who already outlaw such reprobate criminals and use VIOLENCE to kill any of them if they ever dare try to infiltrate your refuge country like they are trying to do worldwide.
The rude language and tone from others is generally speaking, and the homebirth haters did not rail on me here because I never mentioned it. But outside of SA it is common for such rudeness and fearmongering toward anyone who refuses a religious State-run hospital birth. Plenty of inappropriate rudeness about the satanic vaccines and drugs on SA though, especially from psycho's like Jim Lincoln. And plenty of mockery too about anything that's not pro-State religion or politically correct, just look below at the quack statement. It's normal to call healers quacks, but when I call your typical Allopath a quack, then I'm mean and a bad guy and always negative blah blah. Some will say breastfeeding is sexual abuse or indecent, so why can't I accuse the formula feeders of abuse and neglect and threaten to call "CPS"? If home schoolers are called terrorists, why can't I call State schoolers terrorists?
So basically, I simply use the same language against those who use such language against me and others who don't conform to their strange religious beliefs. Get it?
Unprofitable Servant wrote: Thanks for the explanation...
The language and tone I used here and at other times is exactly the same language and tone that is used against myself, other believers, and unbelievers who go against the grain and do not conform to certain religious beliefs. It's ok to dish it out, but when I and others strike back with the bold truth in the same manner then we get all this hissy fit, boo-hoo nonsense!
It happens every day: cowards out there anonymously calling "CPS" on people who:
homebirth, homeschool, unschool, don't vaccinate, don't circumcise, refuse pharmaceuticals, drink raw milk, eat healthy food, don't watch tv, live off grid, live simple, object to Statism, etc.
People who believe and live like this are considered by the conformists to be bad and a threat to their precious "society" (the world in scripture) and are mocked and called all sorts of names. Many are simply destroyed in various ways, imprisoned, and have their children stolen.
If people, mostly so-called Christians, want to accuse me and my wife of endangering the lives of mom and baby for having simple births at home like it used to be and like it's done all over the earth, then I equally have the right to accuse others of the same who birth in a hospital. Same goes with everything else.
[URL=http://www.tirnasaor.com/forum/topics/the-latest-from-mary-elizabeth-croft]]]Courts and Casinos[/URL]
I just come across this yesterday. What a blessing! Perfect for some of you.
I suggest you read it all, but here's a little:
"All courts are structured on a concept similar to that of Las Vegas casinos. I‚Äôve heard that both the courts and the casinos winning odds are 86% to 14%. The wins, permitted by the house, are calculated to prompt the masses to think they, too, can win. From our perspective, we win only episodically and without rhyme or reason. The latest and greatest ‚Äúprocess‚ÄĚ from the Remedy Rock Stars is never any better or worse than what we have already tried. Each is likely somewhat theoretically accurate, but that is moot when, in practice, there is no win. The house/court always wins, even when we also do. It is solely a numbers game and the results of each case are arbitrary except for our competence and conduct. Again, the only reason for the very few wins at the casino/court is to convince the masses to ‚Äúcome on down‚ÄĚ and TRY to win. This grants the casino/court the opportunity to fleece us out of our cash.
There is NO reason to accept an invitation to court. What causes us to think we must? The invitation is for them to entrap us via their tric