|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
| · Page 1 · Found: 183 user comments posted recently. |
|  |
|
|
 5/2/16 3:26 PM |
| TS | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln posts:-
""KJV-Onlyism runs the gambit from moderately reasonable advocates (David Cloud, E.L. Bynum, John R. Rice), to the wacked-out, stone throwers ( D.A. Waite , Jack Hyles , Samuel Gipp, Walter Bebe, Texe Marrs , Peter Ruckman, ..., etc.)."" Thus the Christians and churches who use the King James Version are quote, "wacked-out" - This is a Christian term is it?? If you choose by prayer and study to reject the Westcott and Hort, Aland, Nestle based bibles the so called modern versions then you are wacked out??
According to the diagnosis of Doctor Jim. Sadly Jim seems to be becoming desperate in his bid to turn everybody away from the Bible God Himself has been using to build His Church for centuries. Perhaps it would be spiritually healthier for the Christian to use the KJV and avoid the problems which Jim is demonstrating. God be with you Jim and lead you unto His truth. |
|
|
| 5/2/16 11:51 AM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
B. McCausland wrote:
It is quite serious to indirectly attribute to the devil the revivals and all the missionary work God I suspect that Jim Lincoln regrets his earlier 'rash' statement about the "first hundred years .... " etcEven logic illustrates that this is not the way God works nor indeed the way which HE did work in subsequent times - including today. Vast numbers of Christians today are using the KJV of the Word and many road tested the modern versions and rejected them. Modern versions rely upon the heretics Westcott and Hort whose version of the 1880's was rejected by America when it came across the pond back then. Basing their versions today on Westcott, Hort, - AND Aland and Nestle - compounds the doubts and the errors and omissions. Quote;
"One is entitled ‘The Problem of Anonymity and Pseudonymity in Christian Literature of the First Two Centuries’, written in 1961.2 In that booklet, Dr Aland denies the apostolic authorship of the Four Gospels, the Catholic Epistles, the Pastoral Epistles, and Hebrews. The other work is entitled The Problem of the New Testament Canon, written in 1962.3 In this work, Dr Aland expresses his doubts as to the canonicity of several NT books" (tbsbibles.org) |
|
|
| 4/30/16 3:10 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
When it was reasonably understandable for the first 100 years or so, God used it. As it became less understandable it became more and more the tool of Satan. Until now it is one Satan's favorite tools.
So, no, it's tool in Satan's arsenal Well! Well! Well!
Now we see where Jim Lincoln stands.The "Word of God" was used by God for the first century.
THEN
God handed it over to Satan to be used against the believers and servants of God?????? According to John's gospel the Holy Spirit is in full charge of revealing the truth through the Word of God. John 16:13. In Jim Lincolns "gospel" the Holy Spirit couldn't continue the task until the heretics Westcott and Hort jumped in to make everything clear. Otherwise God couldn't write a book and maintain it throughout history. Jim's "IMAGE" of God is of a being who failed to bring light into the world by HIS Word and Doctrines. "Rom 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God."
However in Jim's "gospel" Satan takes over the Word of God and uses it as a tool to kill the church???? Jim.
May God have mercy upon your soul. |
|
|
| 4/29/16 3:20 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
"They (KJV Translators) were so concerned about it that they even took over the very phraseology of the Hebrew and Greek. We find in our Bibles, all kinds of Hebrew expressions and concepts that are not natural to the English way of speaking. In fact, it can even be said that the English of the King James Version is not the English of the 17th century, nor of any century. It is an English that is unique, for it is Biblical English-an English formed by the Hebrew and Greek of the Bible. It is Biblical English because the translators were more interested in being faithful to the originals than in making their translation in the street language of the day, as do translators today.That they sought an accurate translation is further indicated by the fact that they italicized every word that did not have a corresponding word in the original. How many modern Bible versions do that? Moreover, to insure the fact that the reader understands the meaning of certain original words, they added 4,223 marginal notes that gave the literal meaning of the original words, and 2,738 notes with alternate translations. The result is that in the King James Version we have an accurate translation that puts the others to shame." (Steven Houck) |
|
|
| 4/27/16 3:03 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
"The Authorised Version translators held to the doctrines of Scripture, and through them the Authorised Version, whether because of the Greek text used or the form of translation employed, upholds many of the doctrines that modern versions in numerous places miss. The Authorised Version gives the
Lord Jesus His rightful place; both His
Godhood and His manhood are upheld
(Rom 9.5). It upholds the doctrine
of inspiration which is substantially
weakened in modern versions (Hos 12.4; 2Tim 3.16). It supports the
Virgin Birth of Jesus. It correctly defines and translates passages which teach justification by faith alone, one of the most misinterpreted doctrines in all of the Scripture. These and many others the AV, as the basis for the faith of Christians for four hundred years, correctly and firmly upholds.Meanwhile, Bible publishers of today
are using the present-day ecumenicalism
to boost their sales. Rather than working toward the purity of translation
by careful selection of translators, the publishers instead work toward ‘oneness’. This ‘oneness’ takes the form of cooperation with varying groups, groups which are religious but not always Christian. It is no longer unusual to find Roman Catholics, Jews, and Unitarians listed among the translators" (TBS) |
|
|
| 4/26/16 11:34 AM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
For man to make the decision that the KJV is not acceptable and thus to rewrite the Bible in a form which [he] purports to teach a clearer doctrine, is an insult to God the Holy Spirit who has been using the KJV to build the church for centuries. The changes in modern versions are not only an update of the english vernacular but also the application of higher criticism by the likes of the heretics Westcott, Hort, Aland and Nestle. Man has sinned yet again by assuming that he knows better than God what is 'good'? for the people. The Roman Catholics are practicing idolatry initiated originally by the errors in the Vulgate. The JW's have got it wrong because they rewrote the Bible to reflect their version of doctrine. So interpretation of Scripture is a powerful contributing factor in the conversion of and teaching of the servant of God. By the grace of God! Which is why God sent the Holy Spirit to bring truth and revelation into the comprehension of men. (John 16:13) It is by the Holy Spirit that any sinner receives the Word of God - truth in a saving way. Rejecting that divine method in the pursuit of 'correcting' the Word and 'perfecting' what has been working by grace over centuries - Must be an affront to the Lord. |
|
|
| 4/4/16 3:15 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Dr. Dan showed why the reason of the KJVO's should make one want to use the Vulgate over all others. Jerome's Vulgate was a version with hundreds of translation errors. The KJV translators saw this clearly and therefore corrected them from the original Greek. They saw as do the KJV users see, that the KJV is the best translation of the Word of God available today. The reason for using the KJV is that God used it for centuries to build His church - The Reformed Church. Therefore what God has used and authorised for use is what Christians today want to be obedient too.
God in His infinite wisdom kept the Vulgate in Latin form which kept it away from the common people. Thus the errors and heresies were kept out of the church.
Obviously your friend Dr Dan, may not be as intelligent as the average KJV user to see this. |
|
|
| 4/2/16 5:19 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
excerpt from ....Doug Kutilek wrote:
... I affirm that anything--ANYTHING--which unnecessarily puts an obstacle between the present-day Bible reader and a better understanding of the Word of God is wrong and evil. "anything"??You mean like heretics or papist sympathisers like Westcott and Hort??
Or Roman Catholic texts retrieved from trash heaps like Sinaiticus or worse like Vaticanus??? Yes Jim;
They are wrong and evil!!
So why you keep advertising them and the modern versions NIV/NASB etc that follow these RCC roots - nobody knows. You know Jim;
We KJV users have always trusted God the Holy Spirit to teach us what God's Bible doctrines are and to exegete them precisely. And that works grace-fully, praise be to God and His Son Jesus. Amen. |
|
|
| 12/18/15 2:40 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
in the KJV the Holy Spirit is "it" Jim
Go straight back to the school which taught you English grammar and get a refund for your dollar.Dictionary:-
"it"
1. (used to represent an inanimate thing understood, previously mentioned, about to be mentioned, or present in the immediate context):
2. (used to represent a person or animal understood, previously mentioned, or about to be mentioned whose gender is unknown or disregarded): BTW
You should also get a copy of the real Word of God King James Version and learn the truth. Quote:
"The Roman Catholic Church now had two manuscripts which were used by Hort and Westcott to create the critical text which would become the underlying text for all the modern versions." Quote:
"I want to get to a quote taken from the 27th edition of the Nestle-Aland Greek text giving undeniable proof that the modern versions are Roman Catholic in origin. While there may be Protestant translators on each of the Bible Versions, they are ancillary to the supervision which is under the Vatican. Am I making this up? The following quote can be found and verified on page 45 of the 27th edition of the Nestle-Aland Greek Text." (Dr K. Matto)
http://www.scionofzion.com/rcv.htm |
|
|
| 11/11/15 2:30 PM |
| TS | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Are the KJVOnlyers Christian? Well, at the very least, they are a schismatic, aberrational group. Don't forget Jim, God has been KJV Only for centuries.And don't forget Jim, God hates the heretics who try to offend Him by changing the Bible to suit themselves. The heretics Westcott, Hort, Nestle and Aland AND their followers are sinning against God by defacing His Holy Bible.
As God has recorded of these heretics -
"And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book." Rev 22:19 KJV. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
