Can you prove the KJB isnât the word of God?Dr. Tim, the problem with the argument you used is that:
1. You assume that there is only 1 King James Version, when in point of fact, it has been changed. Furthermore you fail to recognize that the Oxford and Cambridge edition of the KJV differ from each other, which leads to the question, "Which KJV is the perfect word of God?"
2. Your argument is an appeal to tradition, thus it can be likened to a Roman Catholic argument.
3. The KJV was mostly based on Tyndale's version, thus it could rightly be called a revision of Tyndale's Bible.
4. People such as the late R.C. Sproul, did not use the KJV in their preaching and ministry, however the ministry has flourished over America and other places, therefore shall we say that the NASB, ESV, etc. are starting to have a greater influence?
5. It also assumes that a version that is used by God in a great and mighty way must then be the perfect word of God, there's no logical connection between the two.
But I do have to ask you, when the KJV does not agree with the TR, do you hold to the position that the KJV corrects the TR?
Where is your evidence for assumptions? These questions have been answered over and over again for years.
This question is for all the commente