Angela Wittman wrote:
At the risk of being called a "political Christian" I think that the answer Mrs. Bachmann gave was good for the type of public forum she was at. Actually, she is giving the most credible Christian witness of all the so-called conservative candidates on the GOP ticket; and please know I am not one who advocates women in leadership roles. However, she does have my respect even though I can't support her candiacy for President of the US.

I appreciate your stand. I looked at your website for a few minutes and hope to have a more thorough look when I have the time. Your post brought a question to my mind. From a woman's perspective, do you think that a woman who holds to the biblical gender order of authority is less likely to be pro-choice than a woman who holds to gender equality. I think I know the answer, but I am very interested in your thoughts. Frankly, a feminist couldn't give an honest answer to the question - that's why I ask you. If you can recommend a link that deals with that I would appreciate it. I think a lot of women aren't hearing the truth concerning the relationship between abortion and submission.

Your post really blessed me!

CV wrote:
To think that when Jesus said Adam existed, that would have settled it?

Come to think of it, on so many issues, we "christians" and "evangelicals" stand in direct contradiction to what Jesus says, I'm beginning to doubt if Jesus was Christian!

Very interesting observation CV! But that is exactly what questioning the Old Testament suggests. It is also to imply that Jesus Christ was either ignorant, indifferent, or a liar. What a dreadful position to put ourselves in, but even worse, what a terrible position to put Jesus Christ in.

"Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve."

Wouldn't it have been much closer to the truth to have said, "Some Evangelicals Question..." or "Some apostate evangelicals Question..."

Such severe thoughts are the principal causes and occasion of all pernicious evils in religion, especially those which are most scandalous unto it, and most inconsistent with that good of mankind which Christian religion is designed to promote; for things are come to that pass among the generality of Christians, that when once persons begin to damn others in their minds for their dissent from them, they judge themselves at liberty, and count that it is their duty, to do them all the mischief they can in this world. They first make themselves their judges that they must go to hell, and then would be their executioners, to send them thither as fast as they can. Whether this be a representation of Christ or of the devil is not hard to determine. Sure I am, it is not compliant with the advice given unto all guides of the church, of an attendance whereunto they must give an account, 2 Tim 2:24-26:

Michael Hranek wrote:
Alan H
Voddie Bauchman (who is in the movied [URL=http://dividedthemovie.com/]]]Divided[/URL] ) has an excellent sermon here on SermonAudio titled: [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=415111310574]]]Youth Ministry[/URL]

I have added it to my favorites so I can download and listen to it. I have a slow land line so need to go to library to download anything too big.

Street-Preacher wrote:
——Attempted To REPLACE——

Have you not done much worse by propagating the false dreams which you embrace (as if they were from God)? Until you repent, you have no justification for condemning Jim Lincoln. You need to get back to the Bible — sola scriptura! Jim needs to get back to the right Bible...

Your Catholic Friend wrote:
Dear Lurker,

As Protestants love the Bible, so does the Catholic Church:

Your Catholic Friend

The Roman Catholic Catechism Paragraph #97 says, "Sacred tradition and sacred scripture make up a single, sacred deposit of the Word of God."

Also,

"Consequently it is not from Sacred Scripture alone that the Church draws her certainty about everything which has been revealed. Therefore both sacred tradition and Sacred Scripture are to be accepted and venerated with the same sense of loyalty and reverence. – Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation (Dei Verbum), promulgated by Paul VI on November 18, 1965, Chap. 2, para 10"

Re 22:18 "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:"

Re 22:19 "And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book."

Your Catholic Friend wrote:
...it's vital and biblical to hear both sides of the story, wouldn't you agree?

Ro 1:18 "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness..."

Even your pretense that there is no problem with open dialog between light and darkness is a bold lie, and one that many have been ensnared by.

[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=6101194103]]]A primer on Roman Catholicism by special guest
Richard Bennett, former Roman Catholic priest.[/URL]

"Withhold not correction from the child: for [if] thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell." Pr 23:13-14

Camping needs to repent and apologize to all of his followers. And his followers need to decide whether he is worthy of their confidence.

If web-space were paper, Sermon Audio would need to charge you extra for using so much. Do you really think people read again that which you have posted more than once? You might try to restrain yourself for the sake of others. But then, we see nearly every post what you think of others.

TLC wrote:
Sorry "dopey", But I'll Take GOD's PERFECT WILL Over Your "good will" ANY "Twinkling Of An Eye", ANY Minute, ANY Hour, ANY Day, ANY Year, ANY Generation & FOR ALL ETERNITY !

"And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment." 1 John 3:23

John UK wrote:
Thank you dear bro. All is well.
Tell me, this little article is a pdf file, so is it possible to save it as a pdf and store it on the computer. It looks to be an excellent article to give to folks who are confused by the subject and who have no teaching in it.
May the Lord give you great fatherly wisdom.

Chapel library has given permission to download any of their tracts and booklets which are posted on their website. Their Website is at:

[URL=http://www.chapellibrary.org/]]]Chapel Library - A Ministry of Mount Zion Bible Church[/URL]

Alan H wrote:
Read it yet John UK?

John UK wrote:
Hi Alan, good to hear from you. Your input is always a joy to read, and you have been missed brother. I trust all is well, or at least as well as can be expected? I am recuperating from a minor op, so am posting a bit more than usual while time passes until I can get back to my painting.

Which link were you referring to?
______________
If I've missed anyone, please do refer me to your post, as I'm playing catchup.

[URL=http://www.chapellibrary.org/files/archive/pdf-english/ebtb.pdf]]]ENGLISH BIBLE TRANSLATIONS: BY WHAT STANDARD? [/URL]

I vaguely remember you expressing an interest in the booklet when WEB initially posted the link. After reading it, it seemed to me that it was very much in line with your own views on the subject.

John, thanks for the very kind words. I have been a little distracted with my daughter's courtship. It has been up and down emotionally and may end soon in failure, but better to find out now rather than after marriage. I do keep up with reading the posts, but I don't have the time or energy to participate much.

Hope your surgery went well.