|
Page 1 | Page 24 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
12/28/16 7:58 PM |
s c | | Oh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
U S,I'm guessing that you would have no problem with the end of naivete scenes since you are really observing Christ's Incarnation on the RC's phony date? Maybe Christians will,at least,stop going along with "christmas" and the rest of the lies that go along with it. It's just very odd to me that,while the Scriptures say to proclaim all of His works, anyone finds it necessary to focus on one aspect of it which would be mute if not for the finished work. Considering,that if not for the RCC,those who are so zealous in its defense,wouldn't be celebrating it at all. Then again,there is so much Christian "liberty"... and family traditions which to uphold that there is less a distinction between the world and the church. If there is a distinction, then one is labeled as a prude. May we be so like Christ. Adding to Scripture is something that the RCs do,not Christians. |
|
|
12/26/16 5:22 PM |
s c | | Oh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
U S, "...which is about both His birth and His atoning death."That's my point...one cannot/should not try to celebrate the one without the other. If you had not been so steeped in family/church/worldly traditions,you wouldn't have picked a day (as the disciples did not)to "christianize" a day. Esteeming one day above another hardly would qualify pagan days as (they are,yes?)...can't deny that... as acceptable and God honoring.Otherwise,anything and everything is fair game. Of course,many Christians consider most pagan things as viable instruments for worship. This is why we have heavy metal,rap,movies,zumba,etc...in church. If we can use pagan holidays then we will have all sorts of junk that doesn't belong in the church and that's what we have- our "quail",in a manner of speaking. |
|
|
12/26/16 5:10 PM |
s c | | Oh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
History revision. "mass" is used and was always used as a re-sacrifice of Christ.They (RCC) have a way of twisting "to send". Celebrating "christmas" because it was celebrated 200 years ago is a mute point if no one can come up with it in Scripture. "christmas" is not found in the Bible. "easter" is,but Christians who like to pervert the KJV like to pretend that it means the passover there in reference to the Jews when it was/is actually a pagan observance. bottom line-it's not in the Bible and no one ever celebrated it in Scripture;the actual day of His Incarnation,obviously,is not the same as an ongoing,annual day as such. So,"christmas" pagan or Christian? I guess pagans who love it and say it thousands of time this time of the year are Christian? If not,there's your answer. If they do,it's not in Scripture,why do you? Finally,how foolish to celebrate one of the RCC's highest "holy days"...and double minded-we object to them always keeping Him on the cross,as we so should be, but we encourage them to put Him in the manger every year as if He were merely a man being honored by others so observing Him. Why not just observe all of the Jewish holidays too? They're still caught up with the shadows and fail to embrace the Substance. Sad commentary to the lost. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|