|
|
USER COMMENTS BY RANDY |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 10 · Found: 199 user comments posted recently. |
| |
|
|
8/2/07 8:44 PM |
|
Add new comment
|
Great Sermon! As a Christian Man,Like John MacArthur I am blown away at the complete lack of Discernment in Christian Women these days.It seems that so many will swallow ANYTHING Popular,especially from a TV Celebrity. Where are the Women who will rely on Scripture alone for Doctrine Truth ? The TBN Hucksters like Joyce Meyer are fleecing the Female Flock with a Phony Man-Centered False gospel. Oh to hear the cries of the Reformation again ! Christ Alone, Grace Alone,Faith Alone,Scripture Alone, to the Glory of God Alone. Postmodernism has so poisoned the Church it doesn't even know it's History . It is lost to Emotions,Feelings,and Experiences and the Desire for Worldly Success. I wish we could force every Woman in America that Confesses Christ as Her Lord & Saviour to sit down and watch the 2003 Movie " LUTHER " . Maybe they would regain some kind of Balance. |
|
|
6/23/07 12:45 PM |
Randy | | Texas | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
JD,I was neither arguing for or against a divorced man being a pastor. I was pointing out your faulty logic that a divorce or rebellious child means that a man failed to rule his house well. Though it is often the case that poor parenting or the failure to be a good husband leads to household discord, it is not always the cause. Sometimes spouces and children simply rebel against God even in the best circumstances. Moving along, I am not willing to give up any of the biblical qualifications for the pastorate. They must, however, be understood and applied properly. BTW, can you point out where Paul said that a divorced man cannot under any circumstances be a pastor. There is a perfectly good and common Greek and English word for divorce and Paul did not use it. If he intended to say that divorce disqualifies a man, why didn't he just come out and say so. Here is the problem with this whole forum and line of discussion: a lot of rhetoric, little or no exegesis of the primary text. I'm done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|