Now I praise the Lord when even one little innocent life is spared such a horrible death through legal means, but I would change the title of the article to say:

Ballot initiatives could tighten the murder of innocent babies in the womb.

It seems like every politician can find a moral ground by regulating murder or by giving lip service to murder instead of stopping it.

http://prolifephysicians.org/app/?page_id=2

Watcher wrote:
Islam is as much as a dictatorship as it gets. There's no room for reason or growth. It's as much of a religion of the devil as has ever been seen on earth.
Islam knows nothing of humility, love, and sacrifice.
the Antichrist will most likely be Muslim, powered by the Roman Catholic Church.
Yes, hopefully our redemption draws nigh.

Jim Lincoln wrote:
"Should Christians try to force the kingdom on others?"---No

Jim, your way of arguing is effective but not with any of the posters on this forum. The below is your method and you fool no one:

double-tongued marked by deliberate deceptiveness especially by pretending one set of feelings and acting under the influence of another.

And even more pertinent:

Galatians 6:7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

Well my guess is because these arsonists hate God and anyone who might belong to Christ. Of course as we all know, they pretend it is to right supposed social wrongs.

And look at the recent Jewish campaign to make peace with these Muslim countries! Scripture teaches that the antichrist will make a false peace with Israel and then will turn on Israel. And true Islam believes in worldwide dominion in every sense.

Deuteronomy 22:5 The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.

John Yurich USA wrote:
If Barrett embraced Jesus as her Lord and Savior then she is saved. Since when is it evil to want a conservative majority on the Supreme Court to overturn abortion and homosexual marriage?

Do some blacks hate whites; of course. Do some whites hate blacks; of course. Do some women hate men; of course. Do some men hate women; of course.

All Christians are supposed to show the love of Christ to the world and that includes loving our neighbors. Note the below doesn’t use race as an exception. The only issue I ponder is “who is my neighbor”.

HerbalMama wrote:
Thought police are on the prowl. How intolerant of the tolerant.

John Yurich USA wrote:
I am against a married woman working outside of the home also. But Barrett is a conservative judge making the Supreme Court a conservative majority which will mean the overturning of abortion and homosexual marriage. And that is important.

So what you are saying is we should compromise for a greater good. Note the below:

The Quiet Christian wrote:
That's my understanding as well, Brother Frank. I also thought that abolishing this prohibition was one of President Trump's campaign promises from the last election.

How any believer or group of believers could consent to this is beyond me.

One who has been shown mercy wrote:
I would encourage you to be very careful about speaking/commenting that way against Pastors. Actually, I'd strongly advise against it. Having read a recent article by Piper, I will say he did not tell anyone how to vote, nor did I get the impression he was voting for Biden. I got the impression he was voting for neither. I am glad he shared how he thought through a difficult decision.

Anyway, she has been heavily involved with some organization as a �handmaiden” that is referred to as “people of praise”. This group reminds me of the “skull and bones” group as far as secrecy goes. They are also heavily involved with the Charismatic movement.

So, at this point I consider this committed catholic to be an abomination to Christ’s church. She will fool many because of their cultural progressive views of Christianity where any professing Christian who is conservative is considered to be in the faith.

I just pray this is a sign that we are nearing the end.

I’m not sure if the below cut and paste is still valid, but if it is then if these pastors are doing it from their pulpits, then they are violating it. I personally don’t like the 501C3 concept and think that pastors/churches should not be restricted in what they say behind a pulpit or anywhere else.

In 1954, Congress approved an amendment by Sen. Lyndon Johnson to prohibit 501(c)(3) organizations, which includes charities and churches, from engaging in any political campaign activity. To the extent Congress has revisited the ban over the years, it has in fact strengthened the ban. The most recent change came in 1987 when Congress amended the language to clarify that the prohibition also applies to statements opposing candidates.

James Thomas wrote:
Bro,
I think the agenda would be to continue to place a false picture of reality of what "all of America" looks like into the minds of those who Love God and\or hold to conservative values.
Polls have deteriorated from their original purpose of being a measuring stick to simply being a tool easily manipulated to create a false narrative.
Yes, the culture is secular and has been there for longer than we care to admit, but small towns still operate quite differently than the likes of NYC where I'd guess this useless poll was taken.
The ten commandments are still in view in the court houses and billboards through all the small towns I travel and are filled with people who fly the Trump flag under the american flag in their front yard. The only Biden sign I saw in the past month also had a for sale sign beside it in the yard.

The Quiet Christian wrote:
Brother Frank, I personally feel that an important plank in a major party's unwritten platform is about making sex between anyone at any time and any place acceptable. After all, "love is love," isn't it?
We both know it is not. First, the Bible defines 3 different types of love and the Progressives only see one, eros. Second, every created thing including eros has its proper place. The sea is within the shoreline. Romantic love has approriate boundaries as well, defined by its Creator and listed in the Bible. We don't get to redifine those rules without committing treason against the Lord of Lords and King of Kings. Rewriting His precepts means taking over His position, as if we made ourselves.

Neil wrote:
We should dismiss poll results from a *Democrat" pseudo-scientist. Clearly he has a political agenda and thus a Conflict of Interest. And to be fair, Lifesite also has an agenda: scaring their readers.
Though I will grant that young women interested in stable marriage will likely have trouble finding suitable partners.

Dr. Tim wrote:
Yeah, especially those Christian dominionists, Frank. Muslims and communists would never try to impose their standards on others like those pesky Christians do. Good thing we have cultural warriors like Jim to stand in the gap against them.