Dr Roger Clark wrote: Too true, Brother!! Just another example of "...the ravings of infidels and sceptics" (A.W.Pink) !
Hey brother! Yes, they are definitely infidels. I remember doing a really long study on the incarnation. When I finished I had lots of issues that I couldn't understand, but that had no effect on the truth that Jesus was always God.
Titus 2:4 That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,
1 Timothy 2:10 But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. 11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. 12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. 15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
Isaiah 3:12 [As for] my people, children [are] their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause [thee] to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
Neither children nor women should rule over man. If you think that women should be able to lead, then you must also think children should be able to lead.
There is nothing the world can do to undo the feminist movement but the church can speak out against it. All liberal abominations have their origins in this movement. God gave women roles, men roles and children roles. We have blurred the lines so that they are indistinguishable.
John UK wrote: Adriel, the climate change claims do not bother me because I am living well above sea level.
Amen bro, and I liked what Neil said also. I wonder if you could post those two questions brother, which you have posed to evolutionists in the past, and they just looked at you - gone out, sorta.
Here is what I was referring to regarding reproduction.
Imagine a cell forming out of nothing and then that cell multiples and forms a human being; somehow overcoming the irreducible complexity of our vital organs. IOW, none of our vital organs can be alive unless they all are alive. Now, letâ€™s say this human exists, but it obviously canâ€™t reproduce. So, no evolutionist can or will hazard a guess as to how this entire process could start over again and somehow form the opposite sexual organ necessary to reproduce.
Dr. Tim wrote: Of course Jim will claim that Trump is just reaping the benefits of the policies started during the Obama administration, policies such as...uh...and, uh...
Yes he will and he will also say that even though blacks are now working, they still cannot earn enough to live comfortably. He lives in a black matriarchal society and although he wonâ€™t admit it, his theology is the same as Obamaâ€™s; black liberation theology. I did a study on Obamaâ€™s pastor mentor and there is no doubt as to his doctrine.
Neil wrote: .. who is being foolish. The man may have a doctorate, but he evidently didn't do his philosophical homework, for Intelligent Design (AKA the Teleological Argument) was refuted by David Hume and others over two centuries ago. This is why I lost interest in the Creationist movement, for their attempts at using empirical arguments, as Darwinists do, are not rationally defensible. I believe in fiat Creation because the Bible told me so, not Nature.
Yes Neil, evolution is such a ridiculous concept that is hard for me to even argue against it today. I can sit down with an evolutionist ask him a couple simple questions and none of them have even remotely offered an answer. IOW, they just look at me.
What bothers me more than these scientists are Christians who try to appease them while supposedly professing creationism. They do this through theistic evolution or Old earth creationism. All they are doing is trying to appear to be intelligent to unbelievers.
John UK wrote: Frank, both your words and the Bible text testify to the political parties even in the UK. They are exceedingly bold and brazen about the filth they stand up for. And people will vote for them. In a few weeks we have yet another general election, and I am being forced to vote for the brand new party called the Brexit Party, under Nigel Farage. It is the only party which is determined to make a perfect and clean break with the filth and satanism of the European Union. Not that Nigel is a Christian, I don't know what he is, but he sure talks sense when compared to the other parties. He and his fellow Brexiteers had a landslide victory in the recent European elections for MEP's and they make a brilliant noise in the European Parliament building.
Well brother, I have never understood the intricacies of BREXIT, but I have always been against the EU so I hope it happens.
In fact, Lord willing if Britain does actually break away, I might visit just to show my support.
Someone can be a conservative Republican and not be saved. But, no one can support the Democratic Party and be saved. They â€śallâ€ť stand for abortion, homosexuality and feminism. Yes, I consider those things to be litmus tests.
Isaiah 3:9 The look on their countenance witnesses against them, And they declare their sin as Sodom; They do not hide it. Woe to their soul! For they have brought evil upon themselves.
John UK wrote: BIG ENDTIME DECEPTION! Oh, it's only my opinion, and we do have freedom of speech on these here threads, don't we? Of course it began many years ago, paving the way for such nonsense. Do you want to be saved? Here is what you must do: raise your hand in the air and accept Christ as your Saviour. After all, 999 other people are doing it, so it can't be that bad, can it? The only problem is that the technique is not found in the Bible, and God does not work like that. God is a God who saves, and Christ is not a mere spectator, humbly waiting outside in the cold and rain, waiting for some poor sinner to open the door and let him into a warmer place. Jesus is the Almighty Lord Jesus Christ, and he can save the foulest of men. In fact he does save the foulest of men. And when they are saved, they acknowledge that. It is very humbling to be converted by the power of the Holy Spirit.
Excellent comment brother and of course your opinions are greatly prized by me and Iâ€™m sure others.
I am simply going to say this. I didnâ€™t read the article, but I was never tempted to praise God for what took place.
I remember back in the early 80s I received something from my daughterâ€™s school saying they were going to have a sex education class. I remember going there and objecting to the class based on scripture. That was actually fairly normal back then. I met with the principle and some lady. They both disagreed with me, so I basically told them I wasnâ€™t going to allow my daughter to attend class that day. When the discussion was over, they did agree that she could opt out of the class and do something else during that time period. They were actually going to discuss safe sex and how to put on a prophylactic.
Can anyone imagine my behavior being successful in todayâ€™s world; no way.
The bible never mentions you can get saved by raising your hand nor is that the appropriate biblical application of the reception of the Gospel. People need to REPENT! I don't doubt Kanye's Salvation. There is plenty of evidence of his biblical based understanding and discipleship but his services are not official evangelistic crusades at least not yet.
Fred wrote: Frank wrote; "I think that the majority of pastors and Christian professors are simply hirelings and like everyone else they work for the highest bidder and tow the line." That's quite a broad statement Frank, would that include the majority of broadcasters on SermonAudio?
Fred, I thought my comment was pretty clear, but here it is again:
I think that the majority of pastors and Christian professors are simply hirelings and like everyone else they work for the highest bidder and tow the line.
Just remember, if I think something, then it is strictly my opinion, but if I didn't think I was correct, I wouldn't post it. I can't prove my position and of course you can't prove yours.
Jim Lincoln wrote: Apparently the police did not read him his rights when he was arrested, so he got off on a technicality. He and others probably won't get off so easily the next time. But anyway, looking at English culture on the whole. excerpt from, "UK has become socially liberal on drugs, abortion and LGBT+ rights over past 30 years, study shows" https://tinyurl.com/yyqqqxoe
Jim, the issue is that someone cannot pray in public if it makes anyone else uncomfortable even if they are in the process of murdering an unborn child.
And what an honor and a blessing it would be to get arrested for serving our Lord and Savior. Not desire to be arrested but be arrested.
I have a Christian friend who lives in Germany. He said that some of the Muslim enclaves are actually more populated than the villages around them. And these Muslims simply go into stores and steal whatever they need. When the police are called, they come and don't even file a report.
I didn't read the article, but it seems this is also happening in CA.