Wayfarer Pilgrim wrote:
Penned,
I'm a old redneck trot line fisherman, I don't pull up my line till the next morning. So I am qualified to say I am a crazy white Christian man. You see rednecks work for a living, white trash do not.

B. McCausland wrote:
Refering to Isa 7:14
RSV
Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, a young woman shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Imman'u-el.

Mike wrote:
Or worse, harrumphing

and in the case you mention, when the state legislature and the people vote to protect marriage and one judge overturns law (not in their jurisdiction), then it would be factually inaccurate to say that the people did this.

it would be the judge.

however, if you have people who slam anyone who tries to point out the legal situation, that in fact, sanctity of marriage has not been overturned in the lawful sense, and yet people still demand that it has happened as such, who cares what the people voted? well, then they too are with the judge.

what I am saying is that those who side with the sodomites on these issues are not credible, no matter the cloak they wear.

in a time when it is in vogue to slam Christians for the biblical standard, not impressed by those who do.

Freely Speaking wrote:
Why do most judges tell you that you may consider "only the facts" -- that you are not to let your conscience, opinion of the law, or the motives of the defendant affect your decision?

an educated citizenry will already know this. we are obliged to pass down this information to one another. yes a jury can nullify a charge.

God has provided in this rep the ability of the common believer to have an effect for good, and is in fact obligated to do so.

we have some free riders among us in society who will not participate when they are fully capable, yet curse the nation for the lack of Christian influence.

Mike wrote:
Anyone actually concerned over the issue of being told who you must hire, please raise your hand

its a commnst sweep.

and we aren't teaching the youth a framework as to what is going on.

these things have happened before during bolshevics and such, if Christianity does not define roles of male and female, then it is the state, and that is what is being created. state is god. and nothing exists unless state tells you it exists.

JoBob wrote:
Answer: The same thing as a Christian in any other profession!

to participate in the religion is their domination.

its not the Christian construct. in our faith all come by invitation willingly.

its coercion.

I have one Lord and that is Jesus Christ.

There will be no other.

OUTRAGE: Bureau of Land Management goes after Bundy Ranch neighbors, charging them under an anti-terrorism law for burning a brush fire

In case you did not notice wrote:
it is a song about His earthly rule after His second coming, a little surprised pennned posted it. Also, He could not have died and rose again if He hadn't come to earth as baby, so they would not have happened if He was not incarnated. It is not an insignificant event as you make it out to be.

Frank wrote:
I also understood land ownership applied to voting rights, but my thought still stands.

Jim Lincoln wrote:
The Katy situation was overblown, apparently. [URL=http://www.snopes.com/2015/10/28/katy-texas-god-assignment-controversy/]]]Katy Skid -- Snopes[/URL]

John UK wrote:
You can well imagine that in a 10 hour debate

I'll give you a hint... same answer to both questions.

and who created ISIS?

you might even get a third one the same there or quite close

and who is profiting from ISIS?

you might even get a fourth?

and who is financing mslm textbooks in the US and mosques by multimillions or something like that?