|
|
USER COMMENTS BY SAVEDBYGRACE |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 19 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
10/27/08 12:54 PM |
savedbygrace | | Harrisburg, PA | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Vogue,We desire to be called,pro-life(however the socialist media will also refer to us as anti-abortion, with the seemingly negative connotation of anti in many peoples minds). They desire to be called pro-choice(we refer to them as pro-death). Your general definition of pro-choice extends its belief to the unqualified exclusion of the murder of unborn child. This is the first time that I have ever heard of it explained in this way. Could this be to justify voting for a so-called pro-choice politician? Can you name me one politician who "agrees" with the common denomination of pro-choice and yet is against abortion on demand? Tom Ridge is pro-choice therefore he is for the killing of the unborn. Will you vote pro-choice(pro-murder)? I do not give respect to "murder as a right" to anyone! JOHN 3:36 |
|
|
10/26/08 8:27 PM |
savedbygrace | | Harrisburg, PA | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
A statement from a holy servant of Christ comes to mind often.In, "The Lives of the Puritans", Vol III, by Benjamin Brook, we find the chapter: Mr. Hooker wished to be abased and the Lord alone to be exalted. He dreaded outward ease and prosperity, as that which was most likely to bring the Lord's people into spiritual adversity. When at the land's end, taking his final leave of England, he said, "Farewell, England; I expect now no more to see that religious zeal, and power of godliness, which I have seen among professors in that land. Adversity has slain its thousands, but prosperity its ten thousands. I fear that those who have been zealous christians in the fire of persecution, will become cold in the lap of peace." |
|
|
9/27/08 10:25 AM |
savedbygrace | | Harrisburg, PA | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Christiana,Greetings! It all begins with James 4:7 and submitting to God. You said: He fails to mention that "husbands and wives are called to 'submit' to one another. I do not read that. In the context of the verse Paul is instructing all of the familial order to be in submission to the God-ordained authorities. No where in Scripture do we find the command for man to be submissive to his wife. This would lead to total disorder and a breakdown in the family unit. Notice in the context, IF the husband were to submit to the wife, THEN Christ would have to submit to the church in verse 24. This of course is heresy. "trying to learn what is pleasing to the Lord." Ephesians 5:10 |
|
|
9/12/08 1:49 PM |
savedbygrace | | Harrisburg, PA | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Engineer, Amen. Hard to believe but there still remains gross ignorance about America's founders concerning deism. The "reverse" is true concerning the statement about Mr. Witherspoon. By the way even today some may still be using the Bible made famous by one of the founders-Mr. Thompson. If only we had some of the spiritual Biblical insight of Mr. John Jay, America's chief justice during the war. A descendent of French Huguenots and former president of the American Bible Scociety he boldly proclaimed his belief in Jesus Christ in religious conversations with atheists. At the death of his wife John Jay took his children into a room and began to read from I Corinthians 15. Monaghan, John Jay, p. 428. One might compare the death of his brother Peter Jay in 1813. A commited Christian, Peter said to John, "I am going fast-through the mercies of my Savior, I shall receive everlasting life and happiness in less than two days." William Jay, Life of John Jay, I:450.(A footnote from, "Christianity and the Constitution", by John Eidsmoe.) Years back I heard Mr. Barton speak at the Penna. Home School Convention in Hbg.,Pa. Wallbuilders is one of many good ministries upholding the truth of the "Biblical" founding of America. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|