Satan is subtle and because unbelievers may happen to stay at home and wear dresses does not directly correlate with those actions being evil.

Did you have another psedonym? Just curious.

As for Walt, I used to enjoy his postings. Believing him to be a credible Christian, his committment to reading the Bible-only(at least through in a year I believe)shows his commitment to truth. I probably would enjoy listening to his call-in comments.

How many today have semi-adopted seeker-sensitive approaches?

Friendship evangelism;Forty days of purpose;blended music services with CCM eventually dominating, etc.

Jesus seeks to save sinners - sinners are not seeking the Savior.

As far as the so-called "felt needs" of these seekers; lost people's needs are all of the same, all over the world, all through the ages -
the RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD!

Engineer,

As we realize, Biblically(that is using the Scriptural creation texts)it is explicit that there were 6 literal 24 hr. creation days. If we were to compare the scriptural proof texts of Biblical creationists vs. the others the 6 day literalists would have logical, contextual entries while the others most often would have no explanation or would spiritualize the text.

Rocky Lanciano,

Amen!

Christians read it,
How about you?

Amen.

Vogue,

I thought that when you last posted that you implied that you were simply goint to leave these Obama postings and let us "find fault" and give warnings concerning Mr. Obama and leave us in so-called "misery"?

PROVERBS 29:2, says:

"When the righteous are in authority the people rejoice: but when the wicked
beareth rule, the people MOURN".

Greetings! There was a need to mention B. Goldwater simply because of the statement of LBJ's %. Btw, I was only 12 at the time but I remember wearing a Goldwater imitation straw hat as my father was a staunch supporter.
A decent article that you might enjoy and was posted only 3 years ago: "HBO Hijacks Barry Goldwater's Ideology", www.humanevents.com.
Personally, I believe that everyone has some racism in them, including your favorite son Barry and that only "In Christ" does anyone possess the ability to be completely free from that sin.
Have a "grace day"!

Greetings! A black voter landslide for the Democrats is not normal throughout Amer. Hist. From A. Lincoln, of course, until F.D.R. blacks voted Republican.
Remember, 96% voted for the black candidate this year. At least 6% more than any previous election!

If you were to look at a barred graph on the % of the black vote for either party from FDR until now you would see clearly that race was an issue.

Remember, in 1964 B. Goldwater opposed the Civil Rights Act to which L.B.J set into motion.

Who-to the innocent would penalize?
And for honest,hard work would demonize.
Heavily-taxed people would criticize.
If only they had eyes!

Incomes stolen and heavily oppressed.
A Government sham; "through us you are blessed".
Economics - a Herculean task.
You must concede to us and simply ask.

Nothing is said of supply and demand.
Yet, spending is praised throughout our land.
"Consumer confidence", by name swindled.
Bankruptcies appear as savings dwindled.

Hard work and thrift lead to philanthropy.
Not Robin Hood ethics and those of true greed.
Paul said if thou not work thou shall not eat.
Christians defend, yet rest at Jesus feet.

You said,"Obama is perhaps the most gifted and eloquent politician we've ever had."
You also said,"He will go down in history as one of the great Presidents in US history!"

I not even 100% positive what candidate my wife actually votes for while in the booth. However, her statements normally reveal her intentions.

Yes, it is obvious with normal hermeneutics that the rod is literal. There is not reason to interpret it as figurative. Agreed.

Anti,

Are you personally against using the rod?
Are you a parent?
Do you see the Biblical chastisement mode as wrong?
Is God's counsel in the Bible our wise standard?

This has been clearly answered in the forum about the pastor that was jailed for spanking his son.

Are you simply mocking?
If so it is better that we not answer you.

Spanking on the derier is not child abuse.
I wonder if the other party was a "progressive/liberal" Dr. Spock protege type who abhors any type of corporal punishment and adheres to the "now don't make me count to ten method(which of course ends in counting to 100...not to mention an even more hardened will). No wonder these undisciplined children grow up to be child abusers and molesters.
Too bad G.Britain does not have the Biblical foundation that the U.S.A. has with the jurisprudence aspect of two witnesses.
Notice, he was "caught" spanking his son once. And of course once the other party admitted to that he was let go immediately. Anything else is simply empty speculation.

My point sir is that you continued to bring up the racist issue and I was simply pointing out to you that there are no racial distinctions whenever it comes to this sin. There are as many racists in the black community as the white.

There you go again, unequivocally stating that Republicans are more racist!!!

The S.B.C. started out good and became more liberal through the years and I would venture to say that many vote Dem.
Your example is flawed to this extent.

The main reason many racist people can't see that they are racist(such as the phenomenal almost 100% of the black vote for the black Pres. candidate)is because they are blinded by the Prince of this world.