|
Page 1 | Page 13 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
4/19/14 5:06 PM |
CV | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: By the way, I hope by now everyone has by now agreed that "Easter,:" is a pagan, Catholic term? Have a good Resurrection Sunday!happy Passover, I think Resurrection Week and Passover coincide this year. The reason they don't every year is because of Romish/Orthodox Church. For what it's worth Jim, I believe in a Wednesday crucifixion. I believe in literal 3 days/nights. But it's hard to fight tradition. This is Romes doing. Of Rome it is said in the bible that it shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws. 'Easter' is pagan as is Friday crucifixionJesus was crucified as the Passover lamb 'AFTER 3 days / nights'! If this is not literal, is Jonah also only a metaphorical preachers story? You have no leg to stand on when some Romie questions the Genesis account. For Rome accommodates millions of years of evolution. When I addressed the divorce issue, I ran up against why the KJV, Luther and some perceived established church traditions couldn't all be wrong. Much like paedos. No, even our beloved KJV blew it with 'Easter'. |
|
|
4/18/14 9:41 PM |
CV | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Strat wrote: God and knows all things from beginning to end,apart from the free will of man Is this what you're saying? This is the theology of free will. |
|
|
4/12/14 8:25 PM |
CV | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Charles Taze Russell thought that the idea of hell made God look bad. So CT came up with his own theology & started a new cult - the JW's- with their re-write of the bible.It is a dangerous thing to lean on mans own understanding to explain that which belongs in the hands of God alone. From eternity past, God has always existed. In eternity past, before the foundations of the world, God made the plan and ordained the Creation, the Fall, the Incarnation and Resurrection, and the Salvation of His people - FOR HIS GLORY. We don't understand that fully. What we do understand fully is that God is absolutely just and loving, and that no wrong can be found in Him. But the Arminian man is before all things, and in him all things hold together. He knows the secrets of the universe and without his rationale understanding and will, nobody goes to heaven or hell. Fischer says that what God ordained in eternity past gives him a bad image. So he writes a book to give the image a makeover, and restores the glory where it belongs - to the man. But Fischer's real claim to fame is that he dissed the 'C' word. Armin's are rushing to him because - he hates Calvinism. Armin's don't want to admit being called Armin's. But they are all too eager to call the DOG Calvinism. |
|
|
3/6/14 1:27 AM |
CV | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Strat wrote: You are presenting an unbalanced and therefore unchristian view of the matter and as is typical of a feminist/Christian/feminist you don't like being called on it....I can go find all kinds of things on the internet about lying conniving two timing females and I'm sure you would call me on that.....don't care if you engage or not it is the sorry state of the church today. The real issue is submission. God calls men to spiritual headship. To be conformed to the image of Christ, to be more Christlike. It's the man that WILL NOT submit! Therein lies the problem. |
|
|
2/27/14 5:57 AM |
CV | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John for JESUS wrote: I go to a Baptist church and believe in the post-trib, pre-millenial ressurection. So says the most dangerous deceptive degenerate on this site. You can't find a spiritual pulse on this guy. But boy can this degenerate weave a lie with such cleverness and conviction that even God couldn't hold a candle to him. |
|
|
2/21/14 6:58 PM |
cv | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
How much water do you need wrote: That's the whole problem CV. Good exegesis and sound doctrine is missing from so many non-Calvinist Non-Presbyterian churches. Its sad! No wonder Liberalism is growing! In the Older Testament, just compare, cumulatively: Gen 28:18; 35:14; Ex 4:9; 9:8-10,33; 12:7,21-23,37; 14:21-29; 15:8-10; 24:6-20; 29:7-21; 30:9f; Lev 1:5-11; 2:1-6; 3:2-13; 4:6-34; 5:9; 6:27; 7:2-14; 8:11-24; 9:9-18; 14:3-51; 16:14-19; 17:6-13; 21:10; ....... NT There, consult: Mt 3:1-17; Mk 7:1-8; Lk 1:15-17; 3:4-22; 11:38; 24:49; John 1:21-25,31-33; 3:22-26; 13:5-10; Acts 1:4f; 2:1-3,16-18,33,38f; 10:37-39,44-48; 11:15-17f; 19:5f; I Cor 1:16; 3:6-8; 6:11; 7:14 ....... For more :- http://www.fivesolas.com/sprinkle.htm "Sprinkling is Scriptural" Quoting scripture isn't the problem. The problem is tbat it has more to do with the price of bread in Tibet then it has to do with baby sprinkling |
|
|
2/21/14 2:07 PM |
CV | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Be Wrath wrote: against Presby scripture twisters, and their hogwash theology. Can anyone find any mention of the covenant with Abraham in Romans 4? I have NEVER seen ANY reference to baby sprinkling in ANY scripture they have EVER quoted. |
|
|
2/15/14 4:14 PM |
CV | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
SteveR wrote: Doesnt your answer support what others have said here? Did not Davids sin impact his children? Did not Sarah agree to relations with a Bondwoman? Was it not Noah that was drunken? Was not Eli a hypocrite when handling his office? The one that puts me to silence is Samuels children, supporting GRACE and election As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. Great pointsThe one that scares me is this one, "Did not Davids sin impact his children?" I don't know how this works but it's there. God gave fathers the right to be the head of the house. That put's the responsibility squarely on his head. With Moses, I believe that he didn't want to go to war with his nagging Egyption wife over circumcisn. God nearly kills him for his disobedience until she relents and SHE performs the deeds, ironically. With Eli, he DID address the issue with his sons. But God didn't like it that on such grave sins as stealing from the temple and using their position to have sex with women, Eli only wagged his fingers at his sons and said tsk tsk. God took care of it Himself. But ultimatelly, God is in charge, as you point out - "The one that puts me to silence is Samuels children, supporting GRACE and election" |
|
|
2/1/14 5:20 PM |
CV | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
J4 you don't have a clue what Paul is saying there. But before I go verse hopping after you wuth your bad onterpretations ( your favorite pastime), lets deal with 'world'Did Jesus die for all? 'world must mean world'. You have no biblical understanding,no way to determine context. All you have is your homebrewed version of Armininism. World is then 'everyone', 'all creatiion' 'saved & unsaved.' Lurker tried to point out that context should be considered & provided some verses to show how 'world' is used differently. 'No diference', 'same' was your response because you hate loosing. Then you deal with the verses where one is (physical) land & people, the other (spiritual) sin J4, they ARE different The 'world' in Ephesians maybe 'was the whole world (except a few pockets)?' But babies didn't know about the good standing in Ephesus? The word 'world' IS qualified by context. No matter, they all fall far short of your original definition - EVERYONE. But you're shifty, you'll change to suit. Your original POSITION was hot air. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|