|
|
USER COMMENTS BY DR. YAMIL LUCIANO |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 10 · Found: 391 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
11/17/07 9:30 PM |
Dr. Yamil Luciano | | Curing Theological Diseases | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
JD,You made an excellent exposition. You always do. Even if whatever you said was completely inaccurate, Allan's comment would still be dishonest. It's the same thing with me. I spend a lot of time and effort to make my position know honestly anticipating some honest feedback from the opposition and they give no response. Then they give comments like the one Allan just made. And they wonder why I accuse them of being intelligently dishonest. And they also wonder why I point out the ridiculousness and basically humor myself with what they come out with. They give me nothing else to do. They want to be taken seriously, but they refuse to be serious inquirers. |
|
|
11/17/07 9:24 PM |
Dr. Yamil Luciano | | Curing Theological Diseases | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Thanks for proving my point.And I suppose you were also those that campaigned for that rule to be implemented so that I can no longer give a clear exegesis of a passage. Noone cried about it for years when Walt cutting and pasting the WCF. But when someone needs a few posts to actually exegete the Scriptures, all of a sudden everyone cried foul played. It did not take long for SA to comply. I agree with you, according to the Calvinist standard SA has been too tolerant of me. I have heard your complaints of allowing disenters of Calvinism to post here for a long time. Your right, I should have burned at the stake like Servetus a long time ago. Unfortunately, SA can't simply just cut me off without getting into litigation problems. We are in the modern world of democracy, not the old Calvin state-run religion. SA is free to do what it pleases. Unfortunately, they have no jurisdiction over the internet and unfortunately, I did not sign anything bindable that states I had to comply with anything. Thus, the only thing I have to comply with is God's word. But, of course, the fact that I have been complying for the last month escapes you. Now you are complaing about me using the quotes option to quote references! Apparently,YouAreNotHappyWithAnythingIDo. |
|
|
11/17/07 8:40 PM |
Dr. Yamil Luciano | | Curing Theological Diseases | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Alan H wrote: You know, Yamil, one of the things which troubles me the most concerning your posts is the fact that you always say more than you need to say, and that which is beyond necessary is usually unworthy either of reading or of response. That's what you call an SA perk. You should be happy that I do so for free. That's why I am the Weapon of Mass Instruction. Otherwise I would be the Weapon of Minimum Instruction. And if I were, I suppose I would then be criticized for not saying enough.Alan H wrote: You can't seem to brake free of the bondage of ridicule and scorn even for a moment can you? Ridicule, yes. Scorn, never. To avoid ridicule is very simple: don't say anything ridiculous.Alan H wrote: You, JD, Abigail, and a few others on these threads are very dishonest in your often over-rehearsed and repetitive misrepresentations of Calvinism. I asked you in the last post to give me an example. I am still waiting for one.Alan H wrote: The greatest portion of the content of your posts ... Last time I gave you a 16 post exegesis, neither you or your friends offered a rebuttal.I'm d_amned if I do and amned if I don't. |
|
|
11/17/07 8:16 PM |
Dr. Yamil Luciano | | Curing Theological Diseases | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Amen! Just got done listening to that sermon. It is so encouraging to hear other men of God shunning the culture and preaching the unadulterated principles of the Word of God.Linda what I enjoyed about him most is the fact that he made the passage so simple to understand and by doing so he has just proclaimed that God means what he states and states what he means. Some points of interest: 1. Jesus makes a irrefutable distinction between fornication and adultery. 2. God instituted marriage to be a picture of Christ and the church. Just like God does not divorce us when we go and commit adultery with other Gods, so he expects the victim of adultery to be. 2. The issue of forgiveness. Now this is a point that I have not made but it is worth noting. Divorce is nothing more than a complete disregard of Jesus's command to forgive. 3. God's grace can forgive even the sin of adultery but he cannot forgive you and fill you with the fullness of his presence until one recognizes the sin for what it really is. 4. There is forgiveness for those who recognize divorce as the sin that it is. There is a curse placed upon those that teach men that divorce is justified in some instances. Thanks Linda. It really touched my heart when I recalled how Jesus... |
|
|
11/17/07 4:14 PM |
Dr. Yamil Luciano | | Curing Theological Diseases | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
R. K. Borill wrote: As I said before, "been there, done that". Been there done that myself. All the while it gets more and more easier to demonstrate my position. I would think that it would be the same for you. But I guess what you are trying to say is that you could not find it then and odds are now you also do not have any scripture that explicitly declares your position.I figured that. Since I proved to the reader once again that the Calvinist position is scripturally bankrupt, then I think I can humor you in your desperate attempt to change the subjet. Hopefully you can find a simple declarative statement to prove your view on the following topic. R. K. Borill wrote: If you care to move on to another subject, here is a question for you since our topic before us is Justification by faith alone:What is faith? It may be said that faith cannot be known except by experience, and when it is known by experience logical analysis of it, and logical separation from other experiences, will only serve to destroy its power and its charm. In your opinion is this so with you? No. It is not so with me. But yes, I agree with your analysis, although you did not even answer your own question. |
|
|
11/17/07 3:35 PM |
Dr. Yamil Luciano | | Curing Theological Diseases | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
R. K. Borill wrote: The last point that I think I remember that I was on with Yamil or WMI was Irresistible Grace. But like I say their favorite methods to argue is "Needling", "Ad Nauseum", and mostly "Ad Homenim". Other than that you will not get much else from them. How about a simple declarative statement from Scripture:"For God so loved the world..." Sometimes, I doubt that will suffice you. If you would be honest (which you are not) before you went on the ad hominems and illogical fallacies fallacy you were still looking in the Bible to the answer to my simple question: Where in the Bible does it state that Grace can be resisted? I think you had enough time to stall with your red herrings. Let me try to help you out. Read the following statement slowly and allow it to sink: It's not there. I prescribe you some reading glasses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|